↓ Skip to main content

Optical reading aids for children and young people with low vision

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
196 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Optical reading aids for children and young people with low vision
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010987.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lucy Barker, Rachel Thomas, Gary Rubin, Annegret Dahlmann‐Noor

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 196 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 196 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 14%
Researcher 23 12%
Student > Bachelor 20 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 8%
Other 9 5%
Other 28 14%
Unknown 73 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 15%
Social Sciences 12 6%
Psychology 10 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Other 19 10%
Unknown 80 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2021.
All research outputs
#6,460,337
of 25,656,290 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,111
of 13,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,656
of 273,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#166
of 285 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,656,290 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,391 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 285 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.