↓ Skip to main content

Neuronal activity biases axon selection for myelination in vivo

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Neuroscience, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
10 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
373 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
511 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neuronal activity biases axon selection for myelination in vivo
Published in
Nature Neuroscience, April 2015
DOI 10.1038/nn.3992
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jacob H Hines, Andrew M Ravanelli, Rani Schwindt, Ethan K Scott, Bruce Appel

Abstract

An essential feature of vertebrate neural development is ensheathment of axons with myelin, an insulating membrane formed by oligodendrocytes. Not all axons are myelinated, but mechanisms directing myelination of specific axons are unknown. Using zebrafish, we found that activity-dependent secretion stabilized myelin sheath formation on select axons. When VAMP2-dependent exocytosis was silenced in single axons, oligodendrocytes preferentially ensheathed neighboring axons. Nascent sheaths formed on silenced axons were shorter in length, but when activity of neighboring axons was also suppressed, inhibition of sheath growth was relieved. Using in vivo time-lapse microscopy, we found that only 25% of oligodendrocyte processes that initiated axon wrapping were stabilized during normal development and that initiation did not require activity. Instead, oligodendrocyte processes wrapping silenced axons retracted more frequently. We propose that axon selection for myelination results from excessive and indiscriminate initiation of wrapping followed by refinement that is biased by activity-dependent secretion from axons.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 511 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
France 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 494 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 137 27%
Researcher 80 16%
Student > Master 54 11%
Student > Bachelor 50 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 30 6%
Other 64 13%
Unknown 96 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 184 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 101 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 44 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 5%
Engineering 14 3%
Other 37 7%
Unknown 106 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,201,744
of 26,430,863 outputs
Outputs from Nature Neuroscience
#1,838
of 5,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,456
of 280,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Neuroscience
#40
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,430,863 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,755 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 58.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,262 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.