You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Severe root resorption resulting from orthodontic treatment: Prevalence and risk factors
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics, February 2015
Caroline Pelagio Raick Maués, Rizomar Ramos do Nascimento, Oswaldo de Vasconcellos Vilella
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||1||100%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 251 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||47||19%|
|Student > Postgraduate||42||17%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||15||6%|
|Student > Bachelor||12||5%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||128||51%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||4||2%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||4||2%|
|Arts and Humanities||2||<1%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2015.
All research outputs
of 22,797,621 outputs
Outputs from Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
of 374 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 352,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,797,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 374 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,574 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.