↓ Skip to main content

Assessing the quality of feedback in the peer-review process

Overview of attention for article published in Higher Education Research and Development, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Assessing the quality of feedback in the peer-review process
Published in
Higher Education Research and Development, April 2015
DOI 10.1080/07294360.2015.1011086
Authors

A.R. Dobele

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 5%
China 1 5%
Canada 1 5%
Unknown 19 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 18%
Student > Bachelor 4 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 14%
Other 3 14%
Researcher 2 9%
Other 6 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 11 50%
Computer Science 3 14%
Psychology 3 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 9%
Linguistics 1 5%
Other 2 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2016.
All research outputs
#2,411,901
of 11,336,482 outputs
Outputs from Higher Education Research and Development
#147
of 565 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,925
of 210,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Higher Education Research and Development
#7
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,336,482 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 565 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,173 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.