Assessing the quality of feedback in the peer-review process

Overview of attention for article published in Higher Education Research and Development, April 2015

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

So far, Altmetric has seen 8 X posts from 8 X users, with an upper bound of 46,787 followers.

RT @HERDJournal: A study by Dobele @RMIT analyses provision of conference peer review for consistency, sufficiency and quality http://t.co/…

A study by Dobele @RMIT analyses provision of conference peer review for consistency, sufficiency and quality http://t.co/p0KjigOJAk 34-5

"Assessing the quality of feedback in the peer-review process" http://t.co/kifqZtap1p

"Peer reviewers aren’t on the same page a third of time" https://t.co/Q1evvflnNy via @timeshighered see http://t.co/1zbrpVwiba

This page shows the most recent X posts that mention this research output.

Click here to find out how to access more activity, including 4 additional X posts.