@lporiginalg They think you're a misogynist. https://t.co/GGfP84kg2Y https://t.co/7qLA9EgFgg
@LisaPorter2 @HappyStemCell @CoreyFernandez @RySciDean Sorry to hear this. Could your program bring in some expert colleagues from social science for the topic? See randomized experiments cited here: https://t.co/o20KVqkcMc + 2 more experiments that had di
@hwitteman @RosieRedfield Please see Williams and Ceci 2015: https://t.co/9n0VVy0uD2 They showed that stem hiring committees prefer women candidates.
@AdamFagen @maxplanckpress @DavidMJourno This is nothing short of sexist discrimination. As #research has proven, there is a 2:1 bias in favour of women relative to men within #STEM field tenure tracks. Therefore, the Max Planck Institute is only giving mo
@AcadFreedom Does it also discuss the Williams & Ceci paper showing 2:1 bias in favor of female faculty in STEM? It is a readable article for the intelligent layperson: https://t.co/B46BbzcwQb Failure to acknowledge the existence of such countereviden
RT @pnin1957: @MrJobProper There is no shortage of women in medicine. Your medicine references, with their tiny effect sizes, aren't releva…
@AkeSandin @HenrikSundstrom @GreiderDD @socialdemokrat @vansterpartiet Både forskningen och praktiska experiment visar att det inte stämmer https://t.co/0MUPYNIXCv https://t.co/bMD021ACFa https://t.co/JP7CfoScvu
RT @briandavidearp: National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track https://t.co/3N1v8gjVhl
RT @briandavidearp: National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track https://t.co/3N1v8gjVhl
A research paper published in the science journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in 2015 found that there is a 2:1 hiring bias in favour of women within stem field tenure tracks. Source: https://t.co/ABZam9Y6Eb #stem #science #research
RT @briandavidearp: National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track https://t.co/3N1v8gjVhl
RT @briandavidearp: National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track https://t.co/3N1v8gjVhl
RT @briandavidearp: National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track https://t.co/3N1v8gjVhl
In related news, the sun sets in the west. https://t.co/VyGm7mnhx2
RT @briandavidearp: National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track https://t.co/3N1v8gjVhl
RT @briandavidearp: National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track https://t.co/3N1v8gjVhl
RT @briandavidearp: National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track https://t.co/3N1v8gjVhl
RT @briandavidearp: National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track https://t.co/3N1v8gjVhl
RT @briandavidearp: National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track https://t.co/3N1v8gjVhl
RT @briandavidearp: National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track https://t.co/3N1v8gjVhl
RT @briandavidearp: National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track https://t.co/3N1v8gjVhl
RT @briandavidearp: National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track https://t.co/3N1v8gjVhl
RT @briandavidearp: National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track https://t.co/3N1v8gjVhl
"These results suggest it is a propitious time for women launching careers in academic science. Messages to the contrary may discourage women from applying for STEM tenure-track assistant professorships" https://t.co/BJcgnr86NQ
RT @briandavidearp: National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track https://t.co/3N1v8gjVhl
RT @briandavidearp: National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track https://t.co/3N1v8gjVhl
RT @briandavidearp: National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track https://t.co/3N1v8gjVhl
RT @briandavidearp: National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track https://t.co/3N1v8gjVhl
RT @briandavidearp: National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track https://t.co/3N1v8gjVhl
So much for the idea that women are shut out of STEM fields... https://t.co/AJ7HUr0GYf
RT @briandavidearp: National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track https://t.co/3N1v8gjVhl
RT @briandavidearp: National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track https://t.co/3N1v8gjVhl
RT @briandavidearp: National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track https://t.co/3N1v8gjVhl
National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track https://t.co/3N1v8gjVhl
STEM is measurably sexist/anti-male, as William & Ceci 2015 showed. The tip of a large iceberg of anti-male bias. https://t.co/PHTMMxuGqu
Angesichts der immer noch bestehenden Unterrepräsentierung von Frauen in der Wissenschaft sind diese Ergebnisse... https://t.co/AmtJbPd2Dl
RT @JamesADamore: @m_m_myers The problem is that there are also studies that show large bias favoring women, so it's unclear https://t.co/g…
@m_m_myers The problem is that there are also studies that show large bias favoring women, so it's unclear https://t.co/g9y3AbiqFW
RT @HeatherEHeying: Maybe the 1:3 ratio of women : men in STEM jobs is due partially to bias. Maybe. /3 But see this for an alt view : htt…
RT @HeatherEHeying: Maybe the 1:3 ratio of women : men in STEM jobs is due partially to bias. Maybe. /3 But see this for an alt view : htt…
RT @HeatherEHeying: Maybe the 1:3 ratio of women : men in STEM jobs is due partially to bias. Maybe. /3 But see this for an alt view : htt…
Interesting. New study shows hiring in academia is biased in favor of women 2:1 -- when reviewing qualifications. https://t.co/b80t6hs9oK
RT @HeatherEHeying: Maybe the 1:3 ratio of women : men in STEM jobs is due partially to bias. Maybe. /3 But see this for an alt view : htt…
RT @HeatherEHeying: Maybe the 1:3 ratio of women : men in STEM jobs is due partially to bias. Maybe. /3 But see this for an alt view : htt…
RT @HeatherEHeying: Maybe the 1:3 ratio of women : men in STEM jobs is due partially to bias. Maybe. /3 But see this for an alt view : htt…
RT @HeatherEHeying: Maybe the 1:3 ratio of women : men in STEM jobs is due partially to bias. Maybe. /3 But see this for an alt view : htt…
RT @HeatherEHeying: Maybe the 1:3 ratio of women : men in STEM jobs is due partially to bias. Maybe. /3 But see this for an alt view : htt…
Maybe the 1:3 ratio of women : men in STEM jobs is due partially to bias. Maybe. /3 But see this for an alt view : https://t.co/9Y7AxXdBZv
This article suggests that a big reason why women don't become professors is that they don't apply. I wonder why?https://t.co/5ODq4Ir3GC
@ciskadesmedt Juist, zoals deze bv vr de wetenschap https://t.co/QbzyGYKiy6
@PauwelsCpauwels Absoluut. Alleen zijn quota niet noodzakelijk de meest rechtvaardige en efficiënte manier om dat te realiseren (https://t.co/wNi0INnHRx)
@EsliStruys Nochtans veel meer work-life autonomie dan in privé. En nu al positieve discriminatie van vrouwen bij aanwervingen https://t.co/wNi0INnHRx
Women recruited twice as often as men in STEM. https://t.co/VvDmJWOdeT
@akinokoneko Tu y Wired sois fuentes de sabiduria objetiva claro. Mientras papers como este en PNAS son "ciencia marginal" https://t.co/KuZsyGHkuq
RT @buybuydandavis: @clairlemon @anukasan1977 STEM bias favors women https://t.co/fKjoVF30f4 National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty…
@janzilinsky What did you think of this study? Was it a good or bad result for economics? https://t.co/xg9x7oiiiA
@ActualAurallee @cto_movidius @LiogaYukla @MikeStuchbery_ It's not much of an assumption if you've witnessed it firsthand. But anecdotes are week, evidence is in order: https://t.co/eiEuPAq9RX
@pyradius @theasefountain @joeschmo1616 @Telegraph @Ashley_J_Kirk Neater. It's like you're wrong or something. https://t.co/XCurTjT0cs
That experiment was done in STEM academia recently https://t.co/kyJDNVDpuN
That experiment was done in STEM academia recently, and showed a 2:1 hiring advantage for women. https://t.co/Z0Mc93k737...
After #googlemanifesto & @Fired4Truth firing, it's worth noting - academic STEM hiring is biased *in favor* of women https://t.co/vuU0Ge8vXz https://t.co/RtAQijYQgG
@OnceByton @anne_hegerty @toadmeister National Hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track https://t.co/3Y44rGXq6o
@NicholasGwynne well at the academic level there is a strong bias for more women so if anything the bias goes the other way https://t.co/2U8h11kLIa
@macorina @pitiklinov Algunos estudios muestran preferencia por hombres, otros por mujeres y otros neutros.Un par: https://t.co/KuZsyGpJ5Q https://t.co/r9GQsdmMvX
Would it be possible to have a world that was not gender-biased either way? https://t.co/wA74VDo1nS
@FergusFSU @TYCapitalism @kpweaver27 @Mellecon @slaughtermaus @hboulware @FormerlyFormer @denmother6 @KeithBarrett @RogueLLDiggity Can confirm. Girls enjoy a 2-1 hiring advantage over men in STEM tenure for example. https://t.co/7oVwkbmscH
@dalesmm O que hay evidencia razonable de que el sesgo en STEM está en * favor * de las mujeres, no en contra https://t.co/r90aHyQrr4 https://t.co/84X55oMU0n
@Kroy_Wendy @NoraSleiderink Alvast een outputverschil in nadeel van vrouwen dat eens met zeldzaam experiment getest wordt. Idd discriminatie https://t.co/wNi0INnHRx
@GamingAndPandas @therealcarew @BanishedGreg @varshaoforange @Timodc https://t.co/J1UOpsdCRF "Scared boys." It's an industry literally PANTING for women qualified to work in it. And hires that way.
When my dept hired, it was "understood" that >= 1/3 of (grueling, multi-day) fly-out interviews would go to women, regardless of paper app. https://t.co/IzIaMEo2qn
@ItsPlayVicious Laughable. https://t.co/L6pzvN1Opg
RT @CHSommers: @JFayeSF For another perspective see: https://t.co/9h1TJNdzhj
RT @CHSommers: @JFayeSF For another perspective see: https://t.co/9h1TJNdzhj
That's university faculty. It's not workforce in engineering or computer science. I didn't say lack of representation everywhere https://t.co/jpCAoxoPAc
RT @Val_Invest_12: @nitashatiku Explain this study and the data you picked https://t.co/uUIeEoCA58
RT @CHSommers: @JFayeSF For another perspective see: https://t.co/9h1TJNdzhj
@JFayeSF For another perspective see: https://t.co/9h1TJNdzhj
@galantlex Strong evidence of favoritism toward women in STEM fields in the academy. https://t.co/9h1TJNdzhj
@espiers 4 As to female preferences, discrimination and ambition: https://t.co/BT5RHzaIjo ; "informal affirmative action": https://t.co/FmQOP2ioSV
Here is the data that suggests this. https://t.co/uUIeEoCA58
@nitashatiku Explain this study and the data you picked https://t.co/uUIeEoCA58
@naaaaancyg Don't forget the other one I posted about women being more likely to get hired than men in STEM. In case you forgot: https://t.co/J9LsI6nUUf
@naaaaancyg Source for study: https://t.co/J9LsI6nUUf
STEM is difficulty & meritocratic. Males often wash out. But by #SJWlogic, females never do. They just get discriminated against bc sexism. https://t.co/Sr6djASRo4
RT @Mangan150: National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track https://t.co/yNLIoDLi6S
RT @Mangan150: National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track https://t.co/yNLIoDLi6S
RT @Mangan150: National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track https://t.co/yNLIoDLi6S
@SciBry For example https://t.co/NAeiOl6NNU
RT @clairlemon: Like this? https://t.co/2fR7Y0nwH3 https://t.co/o76AvXTVrg
RT @Mangan150: National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track https://t.co/yNLIoDLi6S