↓ Skip to main content

Genetic Damage in Human Spermatozoa

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 2: Genomic changes in spermatozoa of the aging male.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Genomic changes in spermatozoa of the aging male.
Chapter number 2
Book title
Genetic Damage in Human Spermatozoa
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-7783-9_2
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4614-7782-2, 978-1-4614-7783-9
Authors

Chiara Chianese, Sara Brilli, Csilla Krausz

Abstract

Modern society is witnessing a widespread tendency to postpone parenthood due to a number of socioeconomic factors. This ever-increasing trend relates to both women and men and raises many concerns about the risks and consequences lying beneath the natural process of aging. The negative influence of the advanced maternal age has been thoroughly demonstrated, while the paternal age has attracted comparatively less attention. A problematic issue of defining whether advanced paternal age can be considered an independent risk factor, not only for a man's fertility but also for the offspring's health, is represented by the difficulty, linked to reproductive studies, in characterizing the impact of maternal and paternal age, separately. Researchers are now trying to overcome this obstacle by directly analyzing the male germ cell, and emerging data prove this sperm-specific approach to be a valid tool for providing novel insights on the effects of aging on the spermatozoa and, thus, on the reproductive outcome of an aging male. The purpose of this chapter is to summarize most of what is known about the relationship between male aging and changes in the spermatozoa, giving special focus on the events occurring with age at the genomic level.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 4%
Unknown 24 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 20%
Student > Master 4 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Other 4 16%
Unknown 6 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 12%
Unspecified 1 4%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 9 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2013.
All research outputs
#20,198,525
of 22,716,996 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3,943
of 4,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#264,658
of 305,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#112
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,716,996 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,920 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,134 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.