↓ Skip to main content

Genetic Damage in Human Spermatozoa

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 11: Effect of Antioxidants on Sperm Genetic Damage
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Effect of Antioxidants on Sperm Genetic Damage
Chapter number 11
Book title
Genetic Damage in Human Spermatozoa
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-7783-9_11
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4614-7782-2, 978-1-4614-7783-9
Authors

Yves Menezo, Don Evenson, Marc Cohen, Brian Dale, Menezo, Yves, Evenson, Don, Cohen, Marc, Dale, Brian

Abstract

According to worldwide statistics, between one in four and one in five couples have fertility problems. These problems are equally distributed between males and females. Modern lifestyle has obviously increased these problems: endocrine-disrupting chemicals, such as plastic polymer catalysts, alkylphenols, phthalates and so on, and cosmetic additives seem to be strongly involved in this fertility problem. Many of these compounds increase oxidative stress (OS) and thus impair spermatogenesis. The oocyte has only a finite capacity, decreasing with maternal age, to repair sperm-borne decays. To decrease this DNA repair burden, reducing the sperm DNA damages linked to OS is tempting. Antioxidant vitamins are often given haphazardly; they are not very efficient and potentially detrimental. A detailed analysis of the sperm nucleus is mandatory (DNA fragmentation or lack of nuclear condensation) prior to any treatment. Here we discuss new concepts in OS and the corresponding therapeutic approaches.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Researcher 3 7%
Other 9 22%
Unknown 9 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 10%
Chemistry 2 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 15 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2023.
All research outputs
#7,730,207
of 23,505,064 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#1,267
of 5,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,352
of 399,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#122
of 423 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,505,064 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,034 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,942 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 423 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.