↓ Skip to main content

Bioinspired Synthesis of Monolithic and Layered Aerogels

Overview of attention for article published in Advanced Materials, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets
twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bioinspired Synthesis of Monolithic and Layered Aerogels
Published in
Advanced Materials, April 2018
DOI 10.1002/adma.201706294
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiao Han, Khalil T. Hassan, Alan Harvey, Dejan Kulijer, Adrian Oila, Michael R. C. Hunt, Lidija Šiller

Abstract

Aerogels are the least dense and most porous materials known to man, with potential applications from lightweight superinsulators to smart energy materials. To date their use has been seriously hampered by their synthesis methods, which are laborious and expensive. Taking inspiration from the life cycle of the damselfly, a novel ambient pressure-drying approach is demonstrated in which instead of employing low-surface-tension organic solvents to prevent pore collapse during drying, sodium bicarbonate solution is used to generate pore-supporting carbon dioxide in situ, significantly reducing energy, time, and cost in aerogel production. The generic applicability of this readily scalable new approach is demonstrated through the production of granules, monoliths, and layered solids with a number of precursor materials.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 58 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 26%
Researcher 7 12%
Student > Master 7 12%
Lecturer 4 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 5%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 16 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 12 21%
Engineering 7 12%
Chemistry 5 9%
Chemical Engineering 4 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 21 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 86. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2023.
All research outputs
#469,035
of 24,462,749 outputs
Outputs from Advanced Materials
#449
of 16,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,940
of 330,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advanced Materials
#25
of 281 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,462,749 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,347 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,851 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 281 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.