↓ Skip to main content

Home‐based educational interventions for children with asthma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
402 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Home‐based educational interventions for children with asthma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008469.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emma J Welsh, Maryam Hasan, Patricia Li

Abstract

While guidelines recommend that children with asthma should receive asthma education, it is not known if education delivered in the home is superior to usual care or the same education delivered elsewhere. The home setting allows educators to reach populations (such as the economically disadvantaged) that may experience barriers to care (such as lack of transportation) within a familiar environment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 402 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 393 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 67 17%
Researcher 42 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 10%
Student > Bachelor 38 9%
Other 23 6%
Other 66 16%
Unknown 124 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 127 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 43 11%
Psychology 26 6%
Social Sciences 26 6%
Computer Science 6 1%
Other 39 10%
Unknown 135 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2023.
All research outputs
#4,397,549
of 26,311,549 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,707
of 13,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,465
of 147,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#56
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,311,549 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,206 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.6. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 147,762 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.