↓ Skip to main content

Home-based educational interventions for children with asthma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
235 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Home-based educational interventions for children with asthma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008469.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emma J Welsh, Maryam Hasan, Patricia Li

Abstract

While guidelines recommend that children with asthma should receive asthma education, it is not known if education delivered in the home is superior to usual care or the same education delivered elsewhere. The home setting allows educators to reach populations (such as the economically disadvantaged) that may experience barriers to care (such as lack of transportation) within a familiar environment.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 235 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 226 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 54 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 14%
Researcher 28 12%
Student > Bachelor 24 10%
Other 17 7%
Other 45 19%
Unknown 35 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 100 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 13%
Social Sciences 18 8%
Psychology 17 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Other 22 9%
Unknown 42 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2019.
All research outputs
#2,662,646
of 14,546,774 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,474
of 11,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,345
of 100,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#31
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,546,774 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,011 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 100,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.