↓ Skip to main content

Home‐based educational interventions for children with asthma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
410 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Home‐based educational interventions for children with asthma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008469.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emma J Welsh, Maryam Hasan, Patricia Li

Abstract

While guidelines recommend that children with asthma should receive asthma education, it is not known if education delivered in the home is superior to usual care or the same education delivered elsewhere. The home setting allows educators to reach populations (such as the economically disadvantaged) that may experience barriers to care (such as lack of transportation) within a familiar environment.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 410 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 401 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 67 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 10%
Researcher 41 10%
Student > Bachelor 38 9%
Other 23 6%
Other 68 17%
Unknown 131 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 128 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 44 11%
Psychology 26 6%
Social Sciences 26 6%
Computer Science 6 1%
Other 38 9%
Unknown 142 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2023.
All research outputs
#4,500,450
of 26,812,496 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,776
of 13,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,821
of 148,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#57
of 128 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,812,496 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,279 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 148,810 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 128 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.