@WeiZhangAtmos @ChrisMartzWX Conspiracists gullible enough to believe you might not know why you said "the post World War II warming trend". It's so you can avoid acknowledging that the single largest adjustment *reduces* the overall warming trend. http
@w59904701 @BrainFood4any1 @brixwe 3) They researched the data and adjusted it (and adding missing data) and found out that there was no “hiatus” https://t.co/MRGJLfeQM5
RT @KochID19: @1234Fit @Leelah1 @HolzheuStefan Das legendäre Hiatus-Verschwindibus paper von Karl et al. 2015 ;) https://t.co/kme8ipzuhl…
@1234Fit @Leelah1 @HolzheuStefan Das legendäre Hiatus-Verschwindibus paper von Karl et al. 2015 ;) https://t.co/kme8ipzuhl https://t.co/bpkyPjxUga
@DawnTJ90 @prinz_tweet @LeonSimons8 @DrJamesEHansen @MakikoSato6 I have read plenty of context. You referring to a quote in a daily newspaper from 1979 tells us what we need to know about your desperate cherry-picking. The person quoted (Karl) was the le
@justinschoof @clivehbest Who cares who makes the effort? That's a weird thing to say. Asserting that a hiatus is due to internal variability raises many questions. Karl, et al. got tons of coverage in leftist media asserting that the hiatus had been deb
@andsnz @volonolomalo @borghi_claudio @hagaluxmusic @marcocattaneo Difficile smascherarla. Non solo gli scienziati ritoccano di continuo il tasso di riscaldamento globale, ma non cielodicono https://t.co/8zdLkkbCLn soprattutto quando lo ritoccano al riba
@NorthBallistics @curryja Not surprised you haven’t heard this information if you are relying on Dr Curry and people like her for your information https://t.co/OMqu1AUbVi
@hausfath @DinoPoopOil Further context on heterogeneities resulting from changes in SST measurement practices during WWII: https://t.co/Kk2yLcVKMQ https://t.co/6t8HQcLGCK https://t.co/u7J7bpuTtN https://t.co/9hDlZx6niv https://t.co/t33W5IuKOw https://t.c
RT @KochID19: @Martin_Bethke Seit man den ersten ~12J Hiatus erfolgreich™ rekalibrierend (Karl et al. https://t.co/kme8ipzuhl ) quasi im Me…
@Martin_Bethke Seit man den ersten ~12J Hiatus erfolgreich™ rekalibrierend (Karl et al. https://t.co/kme8ipzuhl ) quasi im Meer "versenkt hat", ist dieses Credo der Modus operandi - man muss nur Meerestemp. "richtig messen" ;)
@Rat_Mitten @GeraldKutney @DanCady This shows you don’t actually know what you’re talking about. The “pause” was debunked years ago. “Carbon drought” - lol, good luck existing on earth at 1000ppm CO2. Explain to me the rise in carbon isotope 12, if not m
@Knightborg @DawnTJ90 @FD2you Sorry to see you don't understand twitter threads. Continue reading here: https://t.co/Rt7dqJf3IN
@DawnTJ90 @FD2you @Knightborg by incomplete data, here's a detailed analysis: https://t.co/RWGIwxPbSp
@JohnMcGoo5 @DawnTJ90 @rolanddlp @GretaThunberg In 2015 the 2000-2014 was corrected in one of the worst cases of data torture in human history. https://t.co/soihxgSbcO
RT @ManicBeancount: @philerator @tan123 The key paper was Karl et al 2015. Thomas Karl of NOAA was copied in Trenberth's email. The pause w…
@philerator @tan123 The key paper was Karl et al 2015. Thomas Karl of NOAA was copied in Trenberth's email. The pause was found to be artifacts in the data analysis. After the paper, NOAA, GISTEMP & HADCRUT were all "corrected" & now show greater a
@Peteradamj @oil_strike @rewiringamerica @FriendsOScience Old news, dug up by an unscientific source making debunked unscientific conjectures. Should we believe the science ignorant over the consensus of globally authorized experts? https://t.co/Son0cxwUts
@richard50497075 @TonyClimate @NASA This Thomas Karl? https://t.co/gTGbaeVkXs
@dodders75 @hausfath @CarbonBrief We already covered how you lied about UAH's adjustments. Your evasion does nothing to change the fact that UAH is a debunked outlier, the largest changes to surface temperature records reduce warming, etc. https://t.co/b8
@dodders75 @HamishinWA @_JamesSteward_ @hausfath @CarbonBrief You're deceptively fabricating again. For example, the largest correction *reduces* the global warming trend. Stop trolling. https://t.co/HwmBTAHxkJ https://t.co/RP9Lp9yLei https://t.co/N0VZvd
@Scarfer13 @toadmeister Daily Mail is your source?!? 😂 Shall we look at something more credible? https://t.co/lLfagij8e7 #StopTheHarm #TellTheTruth #ClimateBrawl #RebelForLife
@chriscartw83 Even calibrated annual data of the global scale by global models may contain unconvenient biases https://t.co/geWhhTCJlr
@bruce_juhl @andrewp109 @PeterDClack "It doesn't." Here's global temperature raw vs adjusted from Karl et al 2015 (https://t.co/S1JWyTw2zu) Raw temperature showing more warming. Do you have any evidence whatsoever to support your claim that raw data doe
@TomWhatsoeverB @Cirilla4u @hausfath Let me know when you have a reliable scientific source for those images. In reality, adjustments overall reduce the global warming trend, as has been known for years. https://t.co/zGZYmyAvpt https://t.co/0DAv4S6XsU h
@ScienceSense1st @KelvinBSP @malta75616353 @EcoSenseNow Re: "So NOAA are lying?" Nope. Just you lying by pretending the USA is the globe. The NOAA and their scientists acknowledged the ongoing global warming that you're dishonest about. https://t.co/tY7
Referencias Incendios: https://t.co/V4S7zNbtEN Artico: https://t.co/kwDHcxAQfK Pausa en el calentamiento https://t.co/4z8DVyuRnc
RT @DawnTJ90: This dude thinks Hansen lied in the early 1980's (and he blames me for directly quoting Hansen himself) but Hansen is suddenl…
This dude thinks Hansen lied in the early 1980's (and he blames me for directly quoting Hansen himself) but Hansen is suddenly telling *the truth* in 1988. 😂😂😂
@DawnTJ90 @GeraldKutney @WEschenbach Looks like you forked the threads here, but both of these are outright lies. Dr. Karl authored a paper that there is no pause in warming https://t.co/gq4LTTvmB1 and Dr. Hansen testified before Congress that climate chan
@DawnTJ90 @GeraldKutney @WEschenbach I applaud you for finding something more recent than 500 million years ago! Though in this case you're still pulling a quote from 30 years ago, and Dr. Karl published a report in 2015 saying there was no pause https:/
RT @TaroIstok: Climate deniers recycle...long debunked denial talking points. #Climate #ClimateBrawl #ClimateAction https://t.co/IUU7YMsdRi
Climate deniers recycle...long debunked denial talking points. #Climate #ClimateBrawl #ClimateAction
@JimFish56837379 @insane_voice You wouldn't know a scientific fact if it slapped you upside the head then ran you over. https://t.co/IUU7YMsdRi
@insane_voice @JimFish56837379 Oh look, here's one of the "excitable elements" continuing to "bleat" about this topic. You should the read the entire article instead of posting cherry-picked sections. https://t.co/RQDufOjkOQ -- https://t.co/V6SWZjJ8en --
@OysteinNo Well, that might be possible in some cases if the old thermometers have been exposed for excessive radiation. But it's good to keep in mind that globally the adjustments *warm* the past. https://t.co/GudPwgEvvN https://t.co/H425WbPbFL https
@valmasdel @plustardque @Epamino61753400 @HugoMe Je parle du Hiatus que les climatologues ne se sont pas expliqué jusqu'au travail de Karl et Al.https://t.co/paS5traRcS Travail critiqué a son tour.
@JohnSav94995911 @katahuth @correctiv_org @jeangleur @Frontal21 SO sieht übrigens eine wissenschaftliche Arbeit zum Thema aus.👇 https://t.co/P11vjAKOyJ
@realPseudonyymi @teacher_finnish @AriJLaaksonen @peikko763 @CoolsensuS @pirijanne @JyrkiItkonen @NOAA Väärin. Ja itseasiassa globaalisti korjaukset lämmittävät mennyttä. Kuva Science-paperista: https://t.co/GudPwgEvvN https://t.co/yZhW1ZXmqa
@GregFlato @hausfath It's Figure 2b in Karl et al., 2015: https://t.co/PslRyd78AZ https://t.co/4OsB9qK4HN
@spock246 The simple truth: the politicization of climate change, and the corrupt practices of a few, give good reason for skepticism. Then? Most feed us tw!ttery bullsh!t, to justify what a few have done, rather than honest answers, because they'd be rui
@camjon2 @AcuSense @kjblank80 @EcoSenseNow https://t.co/RwwJxqIlH9 Especially since the NOAA literally wrote an article saying otherwise.
@JimFish56837379 @tan123 Science progresses: Karl et al. show in 2015 that temperatures did not plateau as thought and that the supposed warming “hiatus” is just an artifact of earlier analyses. Warming has continued at a pace similar to that of the last h
RT @AMRubio_: Los datos climáticos de estas últimas décadas están siendo deliberadamente manipulados https://t.co/9fbcm76Is0
@A3Noticias @tiempobrasero @ElTiempoA3 ¿Podeis dejar de hacer el tonto? ¿O es que habeis pillado muchos €€€ para defender la mentira climática? https://t.co/GwYoiGYs8v
RT @AMRubio_: Los datos climáticos de estas últimas décadas están siendo deliberadamente manipulados https://t.co/9fbcm76Is0
RT @AMRubio_: Los datos climáticos de estas últimas décadas están siendo deliberadamente manipulados https://t.co/9fbcm76Is0
RT @AMRubio_: Los datos climáticos de estas últimas décadas están siendo deliberadamente manipulados https://t.co/9fbcm76Is0
RT @AMRubio_: Los datos climáticos de estas últimas décadas están siendo deliberadamente manipulados https://t.co/9fbcm76Is0
RT @AMRubio_: Los datos climáticos de estas últimas décadas están siendo deliberadamente manipulados https://t.co/9fbcm76Is0
RT @AMRubio_: Los datos climáticos de estas últimas décadas están siendo deliberadamente manipulados https://t.co/9fbcm76Is0
RT @AMRubio_: Los datos climáticos de estas últimas décadas están siendo deliberadamente manipulados https://t.co/9fbcm76Is0
RT @AMRubio_: Los datos climáticos de estas últimas décadas están siendo deliberadamente manipulados https://t.co/9fbcm76Is0
RT @AMRubio_: Los datos climáticos de estas últimas décadas están siendo deliberadamente manipulados https://t.co/9fbcm76Is0
Los datos climáticos de estas últimas décadas están siendo deliberadamente manipulados https://t.co/9fbcm76Is0
@jgatorba8 @mastrchief01 @ibxnj1961 @angie53070613 @adamcbest @AOC The actual findings from the people at NOAA who actually do the ocean bupy data. "Warming has continued at a pace similar to that of the last half of the 20th century, and the slowdown was
@kojonkoski @JeffyHop @curryja @RossMcKitrick @SJvatn Oops. See Figure 2 here: https://t.co/W4M1kjwg8z