The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
How Should Trauma Patients’ Informed Consent or Refusal Be Regarded in a Trauma Bay or Other Emergency Settings?
|
---|---|
Published in |
The AMA Journal of Ethic, May 2018
|
DOI | 10.1001/journalofethics.2018.20.5.ecas1-1805 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ashley Suah, Peter Angelos |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 13 | 42% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 10% |
Spain | 2 | 6% |
Oman | 1 | 3% |
Canada | 1 | 3% |
Israel | 1 | 3% |
South Africa | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 9 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 20 | 65% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 19% |
Scientists | 4 | 13% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 4 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 9% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
Other | 4 | 13% |
Unknown | 14 | 44% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 25% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 13% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 6% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
Psychology | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Unknown | 13 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,974,075
of 26,789,890 outputs
Outputs from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#585
of 2,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,856
of 343,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#10
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,789,890 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,841 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,256 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.