You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Classification of Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) Supertypes
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 17 |
| Book title |
Immunoinformatics
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-1115-8_17 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-1114-1, 978-1-4939-1115-8
|
| Authors |
Mingjun Wang, Mogens H. Claesson, Wang, Mingjun, Claesson, Mogens H. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 82 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 16% |
| Researcher | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 24 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 21 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 10% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 8 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 26 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2017.
All research outputs
#15,666,513
of 24,081,774 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#4,953
of 13,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,853
of 314,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#192
of 561 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,081,774 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,579 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,165 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 561 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.