↓ Skip to main content

A guide to Bayesian model checking for ecologists

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Monographs, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#44 of 1,015)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
88 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
189 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
416 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A guide to Bayesian model checking for ecologists
Published in
Ecological Monographs, June 2018
DOI 10.1002/ecm.1314
Authors

Paul B. Conn, Devin S. Johnson, Perry J. Williams, Sharon R. Melin, Mevin B. Hooten

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 88 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 416 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 416 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 96 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 95 23%
Student > Master 52 13%
Other 18 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 4%
Other 58 14%
Unknown 79 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 163 39%
Environmental Science 94 23%
Mathematics 10 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 2%
Other 33 8%
Unknown 102 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2024.
All research outputs
#735,595
of 26,233,885 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Monographs
#44
of 1,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,558
of 344,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Monographs
#4
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,233,885 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,015 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,772 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.