↓ Skip to main content

Metallomics and the Cell

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 10: Cobalt and corrinoid transport and biochemistry.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#32 of 135)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Cobalt and corrinoid transport and biochemistry.
Chapter number 10
Book title
Metallomics and the Cell
Published in
Metal ions in life sciences, December 2012
DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-5561-1_10
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-9-40-075560-4, 978-9-40-075561-1
Authors

Valentin Cracan, Ruma Banerjee, Cracan, Valentin, Banerjee, Ruma

Editors

Lucia Banci

Abstract

In this chapter, we focus on the biochemistry of non-corrin cobalt and on a subset of corrinoid-containing enzymes. We review the import of cobalt in prokaryotes and discuss two members of the non-corrin cobalt-dependent enzymes, nitrile hydratase and methionine aminopeptidase. Cobalt is best known for its central role in alkylcorrinoid cofactors, where the unique properties of the cobalt-carbon bond are exploited to catalyze chemically challenging biotransformations. We discuss the import of corrinoids and the reactions catalyzed by the acyl-CoA mutases, the -fastest-growing subfamily of adenosylcobalamin (AdoCbl)-dependent enzymes. AdoCbl is used as a radical reservoir to catalyze 1,2 rearrangement reactions. The loading of AdoCbl-dependent enzymes with the correct cofactor form is critically important for their functions and is gated by chaperones that use the chemical energy of GTP hydrolysis to ensure the fidelity of the process. Recent insights into the organization and editing functions of G-protein chaperones in the context of AdoCbl-dependent enzymes that they support, are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 3 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 19%
Professor 2 13%
Researcher 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 13%
Chemistry 2 13%
Physics and Astronomy 1 6%
Environmental Science 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 6 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2023.
All research outputs
#7,192,437
of 23,462,326 outputs
Outputs from Metal ions in life sciences
#32
of 135 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,545
of 281,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Metal ions in life sciences
#8
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,462,326 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 135 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,676 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.