↓ Skip to main content

A guide to processing bat acoustic data for the North American Bat Monitoring Program (NABat)

Overview of attention for article published in US Geological Survey, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A guide to processing bat acoustic data for the North American Bat Monitoring Program (NABat)
Published in
US Geological Survey, January 2018
DOI 10.3133/ofr20181068
Authors

Reichert, Brian, Lausen, Cori, Loeb, Susan, Weller, Ted, Allen, Ryan, Britzke, Eric, Hohoff, Tara, Siemers, Jeremy, Burkholder, Braden, Herzog, Carl, Verant, Michelle

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 30%
Researcher 4 20%
Unspecified 3 15%
Other 3 15%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Other 2 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 55%
Environmental Science 5 25%
Unspecified 2 10%
Computer Science 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2018.
All research outputs
#1,394,695
of 13,255,897 outputs
Outputs from US Geological Survey
#186
of 1,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,253
of 267,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age from US Geological Survey
#10
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,255,897 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,509 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,724 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.