↓ Skip to main content

Chromosome Translocation

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 1: Historical and Clinical Perspectives on Chromosomal Translocations
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Historical and Clinical Perspectives on Chromosomal Translocations
Chapter number 1
Book title
Chromosome Translocation
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-981-13-0593-1_1
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-9-81-130592-4, 978-9-81-130593-1
Authors

Ellen S. Wilch, Cynthia C. Morton, Wilch, Ellen S., Morton, Cynthia C.

Abstract

Chromosomal translocations, rearrangements involving the exchange of segments between chromosomes, were documented in humans in 1959. The first accurately reported clinical phenotype resulting from a translocation was that of Down syndrome. In a small percentage of Down syndrome cases, an extra 21q is provided by a Robertsonian translocation chromosome, either occurring de novo or inherited from a phenotypically normal parent with the translocation chromosome and a balanced genome of 45 chromosomes. Balanced translocations, including both Robertsonian and reciprocal translocations, are typically benign, but meiosis in germ cells with balanced translocations may result in meiotic arrest and subsequent infertility, or in unbalanced gametes, with attendant risks of miscarriage and unbalanced progeny. Most reciprocal translocations are unique. A few to several percent of translocations disrupt haploinsufficient genes or their regulatory regions and result in clinical phenotypes. Balanced translocations from patients with clinical phenotypes have been valuable in mapping disease genes and in illuminating cis-regulatory regions. Mapping of discordant mate pairs from long-insert, low-pass genome sequencing now permits efficient and cost-effective discovery and nucleotide-level resolution of rearrangement breakpoints, information that is absolutely necessary for interpreting the etiology of clinical phenotypes in patients with rearrangements. Pathogenic translocations and other balanced chromosomal rearrangements constitute a class of typically highly penetrant mutation that is cryptic to both clinical microarray and exome sequencing. A significant proportion of rearrangements include additional complexity that is not visible by conventional karyotype analysis. Some proportion of patients with negative findings on exome/genome sequencing and clinical microarray will be found to have etiologic balanced rearrangements only discoverable by genome sequencing with analysis pipelines optimized to recover rearrangement breakpoints.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 83 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 12%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 4 5%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 36 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Unspecified 2 2%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 38 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2021.
All research outputs
#14,532,143
of 23,271,751 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#2,130
of 4,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#241,965
of 443,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#83
of 237 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,271,751 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,991 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,747 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 237 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.