↓ Skip to main content

Use of green fluorescent protein to monitor Lactobacillus plantarum in the gastrointestinal tract of goats.

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Use of green fluorescent protein to monitor Lactobacillus plantarum in the gastrointestinal tract of goats.
Published in
Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, July 2015
DOI 10.1590/s1517-838246320140556
Pubmed ID
Authors

Han, Xufeng, Wang, Lei, Li, Wei, Li, Bibo, Yang, Yuxin, Yan, Hailong, Qu, Lei, Chen, Yulin

Abstract

The experiment aimed to specifically monitor the passage of lactobacilli in vivo after oral administration. The green fluorescent protein (GFP) gene was cloned downstream from the constitutive p32 promoter from L. lactis subsp. cremoris Wg2. The recombinant expression vector, pLEM415-gfp-p32, was electroporated into Lactobacillus plantarum (L. plantarum) isolated from goat. Green fluorescent protein (GFP) was successfully expressed in L. plantarum. After 2 h post-administration, transformed Lactobacillus could be detectable in all luminal contents. In the rumen, bacteria concentration initially decreased, reached the minimum at 42 h post-oral administration and then increased. However, this concentration decreased constantly in the duodenum. This result indicated that L. plantarum could colonize in the rumen but not in the duodenum.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Argentina 1 5%
Unknown 18 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 42%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Professor 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 3 16%
Unknown 2 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Other 3 16%
Unknown 3 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2016.
All research outputs
#6,194,024
of 8,155,605 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Microbiology
#52
of 111 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,492
of 238,227 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Microbiology
#17
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,155,605 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 111 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.0. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,227 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.