@LaCroix Ne faudrait-il pas mettre un avertissement sur l'article pour prévenir le lecteur que l'étude a été rétractée depuis ? Il y a eu une erreur dans l'analyse des données. https://t.co/QS1gWSI9jQ
@leila_babes @ADPCharb Sauf que c'était faux, l'étude a été rétractée depuis, les données avaient été mal analysées. https://t.co/QS1gWSI9jQ
@HypathieBlog @sandieux L'étude a été rétractée, en fait, ce n'était pas vrai. https://t.co/QS1gWSI9jQ https://t.co/YHGs6LiOJX
@iamAtheistGirl The study was retracted because they didn’t account for covariant influence (meaning something else, in this case country of origin) was impacting the results. https://t.co/twwRdIRRLp
@iamAtheistGirl LOL https://t.co/AvzfpMECxB retracted
@Oli45701Oli @iamAtheistGirl Here's the link you uneducated cockwomble. Get your head out of your ass and try to be a normal functioning human. https://t.co/L9Cd7sfwvS
@iamAtheistGirl Not so fast. RETRACTION: https://t.co/CK58KQOGdq https://t.co/HJ2R96vA2c
@iamAtheistGirl The entire supporting documents for this article was retracted. But look how many people jumped on this b/c it confirmed their own bias. https://t.co/PY37ogZYoY
... https://t.co/wxFrPyL5TV 2/2
This appears to be the same retracted study I've already informed you about, Atheist Girl. But, hey, at least you found an article w/o a link to study so no1 can check this time. 😉 "Dr Jean Decety" in the article vs. "Jean Decety" in the retracted paper.
@iamAtheistGirl This appears to be the same retracted study I've already informed you about, Atheist Girl. But, hey, at least you found an article w/o a link to the actual study this time. 😉 "Dr Jean Decety" in the article on the paper vs. "Jean Decety" i
The study PDF linked in the article has "RETRACTED" stamped on every page. Surprise! The atheists who did the study got #TheScience wrong. The data are actually correlated to the country of origin, not to religion. #WellDone! https://t.co/U27OcuaxpJ
@iamAtheistGirl The study PDF linked in the article has "RETRACTED" stamped on every page: https://t.co/33WCljAeJu The atheists who did the study got #TheScience wrong. The data are actually correlated to the country of origin and not to the religion. #W
That study was RETRACTED. See this: https://t.co/lZaiuBMA1J
@brent2501 @HeterodoxyH @BarbaraRKay The study that the Scientific American article is based on has been retracted at the request of the authors. Strangely, the article does not have an addendum noting that. https://t.co/433QjcnUMb
Not only was the study you cited retracted (https://t.co/tP63u9rQre) but religiosity is correlated with generosity and caring for others (https://t.co/zD3ThyCz1d) https://t.co/KnnSuzUnFP
@iamAtheistGirl Not only was the study you cited retracted (https://t.co/tP63u9rQre) but religiosity is correlated with generosity and caring for others (https://t.co/zD3ThyCz1d) https://t.co/BLux6v6aWN
@iamAtheistGirl https://t.co/KpBKA45VNa The study itself
@konigvs Esse estudo não foi validado. https://t.co/EY5YngwIzc https://t.co/iFhQq5ljKS
@CatarinaCoutin3 O artigo foi retirado porque os investigadores concluíram que o factor predicativo fundamental era a geografia. https://t.co/t6xBC0Xh3a
@A51Guyy @TommyDante @VosslerBen @BigTexBobo @tinyklaus Authority, purity, ingroup... LoL As already stated, this jpg is worthless without source and without naming the study group. "My dream" won't happen is supposed to mean what? Here some FACTS, what re
@itisi_ives @WhyRWeHere99 Sources for the claim in previous tweet: https://t.co/z2FUJLyuH9 https://t.co/0A85V3PVcS. And this one finding no difference https://t.co/Nsw0JUvaf9
@Ijawphilosopher @Human101Nature https://t.co/RNtQnn4CV0 it’s actually the opposite
@HereticArtist @terra155 Oh. And the study was retracted. I don't remember too much, but I've read this one before, and I'm not surprised that it was retracted. https://t.co/u8X3jPMW0u
@haanbst نه گاردین پس نگرفته چیزی رو. مقالهای که مبنای این گزارش گاردین بود سال ۲۰۱۹ پس گرفته شد. این اصل مقاله https://t.co/ZQDPnbQKxh
عنوان شده بود که کودکان مسلمانان از این نظر نسبت به بقیه ادیان وضع بدتری دارند. https://t.co/1xEEd6b5N8
@JBRP6 @cdsanner @ExmoProphetess significant, we feel it necessary to explicitly correct the scientific record, and we are therefore retracting the article. https://t.co/3giYOU93nb
@lavra_m @da_itak To mi je res zelo všeč ko mi podajaš raziskave katerih članki so bili umaknjeni, prosim še kakšno tako, ker očitno je na tem svetu tako, da bolj kot je članek slab, boljši je po tvoje 🤣 https://t.co/wRAzvaLe0u https://t.co/DZ9YZ6BCfz
RT @doctorscience: The study this article is based on has been *retracted* by the authors (when they re-analyzed their data): https://t.co/…
@granolasandal I was pursuing the paper the article is based on and it looks like a retraction was issued. tl;dr: They realized many of the outcomes correlate more strongly with country of origin than with religion. (It doesn't say which countries are as
The study this article is based on has been *retracted* by the authors (when they re-analyzed their data): https://t.co/Abo0W72u7S Country of origin turns out to be more important than religion
https://t.co/zFq1OHPHVM Apparently it was because of a coding error leading to data analysis mistakes.
@Leonigirls sama-sama mbak, bisa di cek di link ini kalau memang berminat sama artikelnya https://t.co/Xae86Ogrd8
link artikel yang dimaksud https://t.co/Xae86Ogrd8
If you follow the links in the Guardian article you will find that the primary article has been retracted -- I don't know why, though. https://t.co/lZaiuBMA1J
@arindhalstr @AmbarwatiRexy Risetnya retraced sih tapi jadi pengingat juga kalo agamanya udah sempurna tapi pengikutnya yang masih kurang memaknai pelajaran agama yang sudah dilakukannya, makanya diwajibkan untuk mendalaminya https://t.co/Cap1XyjnDA
@barbourshopper @William89784600 @MayraFlores2022 That study has been retracted because their conclusions--the conclusions you're relying on--were completely wrong. https://t.co/JAvBWTuSCs
@DNDebatt Skulle vilja höra er förklaring hur en debattartikel av en professor kan hänvisa till en artikel som är indragen som"en särskilt intressant studie". Det framgår bara man klickar på länken. Kollar ni inte sådant? Måste inte en professor ha bättre
"Jag har ett scoop", eller hur är det man säger nuförtiden?
På @DNDebatt går Rothstein på om tesen att "religion i allmänhet" (som om det fanns) leder till dålig moral Han hävisar till en "särskilt intressant studie" som uppges visa detta redan hos barn. Men den har dragits tillbaka pga vetenskapligt undermålig
@emancipatedteri @LaxDisciple That article was retracted. They determined country of origin, rather than religious affiliation, was the primary predictor: https://t.co/ZP9ZyPjyGd
@RaevenNZ @BlakeWriting Googling myself may not, and in this case, did not, lead me to the same research. For instance, this result showed that one of the studies has been retracted: https://t.co/pkrtNEsp6n.
@Daryl_Elliott @BeatTheCult The basis for this article is a research paper which has been retracted. https://t.co/9PrYdW6jRZ
@lis_tomasz Panie Tomaszu, były takie badania, w których pokazano, że poziom empatii i wierzących jest niższy niż u nie wierzących. https://t.co/mxmbdotMk8
@KrzysZdziwiony Empatia: https://t.co/C36Izzng74
@CristiansPV @JosuJoWatch @DarkSlaayz Falacia anecdotica, lo que hayan hecho esas personas son eso, casos aislados que son inutiles para dar una descripcion general. La realidad es que una persina atea no es menos inmoral que una creyente https://t.co/Lewg
@Indebrouck @franceinter « Les sondages » lol, lesquels,les vôtres? Car moi j’ai l’inverse « une étude américaine publiée dans « Current Biology » montre que les enfants élevés dans des familles non religieuses sont plus sensibilisés à l'injustice que leu
RT @marmuzah: It took under ten seconds for me to find out that this is a retracted study lmao (this was not covered in the media) All you…
RT @marmuzah: It took under ten seconds for me to find out that this is a retracted study lmao (this was not covered in the media) All you…
RT @marmuzah: It took under ten seconds for me to find out that this is a retracted study lmao (this was not covered in the media) All you…
RT @marmuzah: It took under ten seconds for me to find out that this is a retracted study lmao (this was not covered in the media) All you…
RT @marmuzah: It took under ten seconds for me to find out that this is a retracted study lmao (this was not covered in the media) All you…
RT @marmuzah: It took under ten seconds for me to find out that this is a retracted study lmao (this was not covered in the media) All you…
RT @marmuzah: It took under ten seconds for me to find out that this is a retracted study lmao (this was not covered in the media) All you…
RT @marmuzah: It took under ten seconds for me to find out that this is a retracted study lmao (this was not covered in the media) All you…
RT @marmuzah: It took under ten seconds for me to find out that this is a retracted study lmao (this was not covered in the media) All you…
RT @marmuzah: It took under ten seconds for me to find out that this is a retracted study lmao (this was not covered in the media) All you…
RT @marmuzah: It took under ten seconds for me to find out that this is a retracted study lmao (this was not covered in the media) All you…
RT @marmuzah: It took under ten seconds for me to find out that this is a retracted study lmao (this was not covered in the media) All you…
RT @marmuzah: It took under ten seconds for me to find out that this is a retracted study lmao (this was not covered in the media) All you…
RT @marmuzah: It took under ten seconds for me to find out that this is a retracted study lmao (this was not covered in the media) All you…
RT @marmuzah: It took under ten seconds for me to find out that this is a retracted study lmao (this was not covered in the media) All you…
RT @marmuzah: It took under ten seconds for me to find out that this is a retracted study lmao (this was not covered in the media) All you…
RT @marmuzah: It took under ten seconds for me to find out that this is a retracted study lmao (this was not covered in the media) All you…
RT @marmuzah: It took under ten seconds for me to find out that this is a retracted study lmao (this was not covered in the media) All you…
RT @marmuzah: It took under ten seconds for me to find out that this is a retracted study lmao (this was not covered in the media) All you…
RT @marmuzah: It took under ten seconds for me to find out that this is a retracted study lmao (this was not covered in the media) All you…
RT @marmuzah: It took under ten seconds for me to find out that this is a retracted study lmao (this was not covered in the media) All you…
RT @marmuzah: It took under ten seconds for me to find out that this is a retracted study lmao (this was not covered in the media) All you…
@theoceanlawyers https://t.co/vhs6JK7SNb This piece of research has been RETRACTED by the study authors!
RT @marmuzah: It took under ten seconds for me to find out that this is a retracted study lmao (this was not covered in the media) All you…
RT @marmuzah: It took under ten seconds for me to find out that this is a retracted study lmao (this was not covered in the media) All you…
It took under ten seconds for me to find out that this is a retracted study lmao (this was not covered in the media) All you did was show how the media and our institutions manufacture propaganda due to their anti religion bias https://t.co/MupwKErrNY ht
@DerorCurrency @TheRealLyno @BethanyinCBR @pyrmontvillage Yes please look it up at the source: https://t.co/EQaWlysID2 Cherry picking a quote from the retraction as summarised in an article from a dubious think tank site to debunk a dubious news site arti
@BethanyinCBR The article was retracted by the authors due to an error in their evaluation of the data (they didn't take country of origin into account). even so, they still viewed the difference in altruism between the groups was significant. https://t.c
@BethanyinCBR This study has been retracted: https://t.co/pEpXqHOeDZ Googling the title would have told you that in 2 seconds. #checkyourself
So I clicked through to the study and https://t.co/U9o1ljZ0Vz
@gibersok «When we reanalyzed these data to correct this error, we found that country of origin, rather than religious affiliation, is the primary predictor of several of the outcomes.» https://t.co/HDNOJQy40Z