You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Seabird plastic ingestion differs among collection methods: Examples from the short-tailed shearwater
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Pollution, September 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.09.007 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Airam Rodríguez, Francisco Ramírez, M. Nazaret Carrasco, André Chiaradia |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 76 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 12 | 16% |
| Australia | 8 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 7% |
| Portugal | 4 | 5% |
| Canada | 3 | 4% |
| United States | 3 | 4% |
| Réunion | 2 | 3% |
| Peru | 1 | 1% |
| Argentina | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 34 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 55 | 72% |
| Scientists | 19 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 120 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 18% |
| Researcher | 18 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 11% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 38 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 34 | 28% |
| Environmental Science | 18 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Unknown | 45 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2022.
All research outputs
#889,539
of 25,766,791 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Pollution
#386
of 13,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,568
of 346,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Pollution
#5
of 320 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,766,791 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,671 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,433 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 320 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.