↓ Skip to main content

Seabird plastic ingestion differs among collection methods: Examples from the short-tailed shearwater

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Pollution, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
84 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Seabird plastic ingestion differs among collection methods: Examples from the short-tailed shearwater
Published in
Environmental Pollution, December 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.09.007
Pubmed ID
Authors

Airam Rodríguez, Francisco Ramírez, M. Nazaret Carrasco, André Chiaradia

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 84 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 78 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 19%
Student > Bachelor 12 15%
Student > Master 12 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 14%
Other 5 6%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 13 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 37%
Environmental Science 17 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 4%
Chemistry 3 4%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 18 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2020.
All research outputs
#536,155
of 17,635,820 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Pollution
#204
of 8,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,032
of 282,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Pollution
#4
of 207 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,635,820 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,668 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,925 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 207 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.