↓ Skip to main content

Seabird plastic ingestion differs among collection methods: Examples from the short-tailed shearwater

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Pollution, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
76 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Seabird plastic ingestion differs among collection methods: Examples from the short-tailed shearwater
Published in
Environmental Pollution, September 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.09.007
Pubmed ID
Authors

Airam Rodríguez, Francisco Ramírez, M. Nazaret Carrasco, André Chiaradia

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 76 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 120 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 16%
Researcher 18 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 12%
Student > Master 14 12%
Other 5 4%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 39 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 27%
Environmental Science 19 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 3%
Chemistry 3 3%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 46 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2022.
All research outputs
#922,823
of 26,178,431 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Pollution
#397
of 13,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,964
of 349,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Pollution
#5
of 320 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,178,431 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,816 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,113 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 320 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.