↓ Skip to main content
What is this page? Embed badge

Seabird plastic ingestion differs among collection methods: Examples from the short-tailed shearwater

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Pollution, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
79 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
Summary Twitter Facebook Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Seabird plastic ingestion differs among collection methods: Examples from the short-tailed shearwater
Published in
Environmental Pollution, December 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.09.007
Pubmed ID
30408862
Authors

Airam Rodríguez, Francisco Ramírez, M. Nazaret Carrasco, André Chiaradia

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 79 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 107 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 17%
Student > Bachelor 16 15%
Student > Master 15 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 12%
Other 5 5%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 29 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 29%
Environmental Science 18 17%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Chemistry 3 3%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 36 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2020.
All research outputs
#823,388
of 23,743,910 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Pollution
#341
of 12,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,934
of 440,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Pollution
#12
of 453 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,743,910 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,624 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,713 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 453 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.

This page is provided by Altmetric.