The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Accuracy of intraoperative frozen section for the evaluation of ovarian neoplasms: an institutional experience
|
---|---|
Published in |
World Journal of Surgical Oncology, March 2016
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12957-016-0849-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Atif Ali Hashmi, Samreen Naz, Muhammad Muzzammil Edhi, Naveen Faridi, Syed Danish Hussain, Shazia Mumtaz, Mehmood Khan |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 62 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 10% |
Other | 6 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 10% |
Student > Master | 5 | 8% |
Other | 11 | 18% |
Unknown | 20 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 48% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 3% |
Unknown | 21 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2018.
All research outputs
#15,547,315
of 23,106,390 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#625
of 2,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,503
of 301,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#11
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,106,390 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,065 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,735 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.