↓ Skip to main content

Positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for assessing tumour resectability in advanced epithelial ovarian/fallopian tube/primary peritoneal cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for assessing tumour resectability in advanced epithelial ovarian/fallopian tube/primary peritoneal cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012567.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joline F Roze, Jacob P Hoogendam, Fleur T van de Wetering, René Spijker, Leen Verleye, Joan Vlayen, Wouter B Veldhuis, Rob JPM Scholten, Ronald P Zweemer

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 145 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 11%
Student > Master 15 10%
Other 11 8%
Researcher 11 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 6%
Other 23 16%
Unknown 60 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 1%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 1%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 64 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2020.
All research outputs
#6,784,416
of 26,794,105 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,153
of 13,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,243
of 361,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#147
of 223 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,794,105 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,278 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.0. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,631 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 223 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.