↓ Skip to main content

Urban versus conventional agriculture, taxonomy of resource profiles: a review

Overview of attention for article published in Agronomy for Sustainable Development, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#16 of 771)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
133 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
511 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Urban versus conventional agriculture, taxonomy of resource profiles: a review
Published in
Agronomy for Sustainable Development, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/s13593-015-0348-4
Authors

Benjamin Goldstein, Michael Hauschild, John Fernández, Morten Birkved

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 511 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 505 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 101 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 78 15%
Researcher 59 12%
Student > Bachelor 42 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 5%
Other 87 17%
Unknown 119 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 98 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 69 14%
Engineering 46 9%
Social Sciences 41 8%
Unspecified 18 4%
Other 89 17%
Unknown 150 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 121. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2024.
All research outputs
#343,146
of 25,304,569 outputs
Outputs from Agronomy for Sustainable Development
#16
of 771 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,129
of 407,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Agronomy for Sustainable Development
#1
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,304,569 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 771 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 407,133 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.