The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 142 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Improving trial recruitment processes: how qualitative methodologies can be used to address the top 10 research priorities identified within the PRioRiTy study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Trials, October 2018
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13063-018-2964-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Marita Hennessy, Andrew Hunter, Patricia Healy, Sandra Galvin, Catherine Houghton |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 46 | 32% |
Ireland | 27 | 19% |
United States | 9 | 6% |
Canada | 5 | 4% |
Australia | 4 | 3% |
Montenegro | 2 | 1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Curaçao | 1 | <1% |
Saudi Arabia | 1 | <1% |
Other | 5 | 4% |
Unknown | 41 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 76 | 54% |
Scientists | 45 | 32% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 19 | 13% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 7 | 21% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 15% |
Student > Master | 4 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 12% |
Unknown | 10 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 24% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 9% |
Arts and Humanities | 2 | 6% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
Other | 6 | 18% |
Unknown | 12 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 95. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2019.
All research outputs
#486,400
of 26,802,131 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#57
of 6,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,937
of 364,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#1
of 154 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,802,131 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,716 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,724 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 154 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.