You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effects of intermittent and continuous calorie restriction on body weight and metabolism over 50 wk: a randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1093/ajcn/nqy196 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ruth Schübel, Johanna Nattenmüller, Disorn Sookthai, Tobias Nonnenmacher, Mirja E Graf, Lena Riedl, Christopher L Schlett, Oyunbileg von Stackelberg, Theron Johnson, Diana Nabers, Romy Kirsten, Mario Kratz, Hans-Ulrich Kauczor, Cornelia M Ulrich, Rudolf Kaaks, Tilman Kühn |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 229 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 36 | 16% |
| Spain | 35 | 15% |
| Canada | 18 | 8% |
| Australia | 7 | 3% |
| Chile | 5 | 2% |
| Saudi Arabia | 5 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 2% |
| Mexico | 4 | 2% |
| Ireland | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 26 | 11% |
| Unknown | 86 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 144 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 46 | 20% |
| Scientists | 37 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 471 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 471 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 89 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 50 | 11% |
| Researcher | 34 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 5% |
| Other | 22 | 5% |
| Other | 73 | 15% |
| Unknown | 179 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 84 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 80 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 32 | 7% |
| Sports and Recreations | 22 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 4% |
| Other | 42 | 9% |
| Unknown | 190 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 912. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2024.
All research outputs
#19,196
of 25,755,403 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#59
of 12,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#341
of 364,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#2
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,755,403 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,666 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,747 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.