You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
New COPE guidelines on publication process manipulation: why they matter
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Research Integrity and Peer Review, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41073-018-0059-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jigisha Patel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 5 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 8% |
| United States | 3 | 8% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 5% |
| Peru | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 16 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 65% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 19% |
| Scientists | 5 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 21% |
| Librarian | 2 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 7% |
| Researcher | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2019.
All research outputs
#1,055,004
of 25,165,468 outputs
Outputs from Research Integrity and Peer Review
#53
of 130 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,992
of 449,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Integrity and Peer Review
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,165,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 130 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 74.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,895 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.