↓ Skip to main content

Gender, Flexibility Stigma and the Perceived Negative Consequences of Flexible Working in the UK

Overview of attention for article published in Social Indicators Research, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#7 of 1,903)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
22 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
30 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
110 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
310 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gender, Flexibility Stigma and the Perceived Negative Consequences of Flexible Working in the UK
Published in
Social Indicators Research, November 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11205-018-2036-7
Authors

Heejung Chung

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 310 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 310 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 60 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 10%
Student > Bachelor 26 8%
Researcher 13 4%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 3%
Other 41 13%
Unknown 129 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 53 17%
Social Sciences 39 13%
Psychology 34 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 10 3%
Unspecified 8 3%
Other 35 11%
Unknown 131 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 214. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2024.
All research outputs
#181,405
of 25,413,176 outputs
Outputs from Social Indicators Research
#7
of 1,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,648
of 445,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Indicators Research
#2
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,413,176 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,903 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,920 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.