The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
El proceso de elegibilidad en argentina: rituales y ambivalencias en el reconocimiento de los refugiados
|
---|---|
Published in |
REMHU : Revista Interdisciplinar da Mobilidade Humana, September 2018
|
DOI | 10.1590/1980-85852503880005409 |
Authors |
Janneth Karime Clavijo |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 2 | 33% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 2 | 33% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 17% |
Psychology | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2018.
All research outputs
#6,740,219
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from REMHU : Revista Interdisciplinar da Mobilidade Humana
#10
of 86 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,940
of 346,885 outputs
Outputs of similar age from REMHU : Revista Interdisciplinar da Mobilidade Humana
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 86 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,885 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.