↓ Skip to main content

Epistasis

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Epistasis'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Long-Term Selection Experiments: Epistasis and the Response to Selection
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Finding the Epistasis Needles in the Genome-Wide Haystack
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Biological Knowledge-Driven Analysis of Epistasis in Human GWAS with Application to Lipid Traits.
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Epistasis for quantitative traits in Drosophila.
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Epistasis in the risk of human neuropsychiatric disease.
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 On the Partitioning of Genetic Variance with Epistasis
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Measuring gene interactions.
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Two Rules for the Detection and Quantification of Epistasis and Other Interaction Effects
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Direct Approach to Modeling Epistasis
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Capacitating Epistasis—Detection and Role in the Genetic Architecture of Complex Traits
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Compositional Epistasis: An Epidemiologic Perspective
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Identification of Genome-Wide SNP-SNP and SNP-Clinical Boolean Interactions in Age-Related Macular Degeneration.
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Epistasis Analysis Using Information Theory
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Genome-wide epistasis and pleiotropy characterized by the bipartite human phenotype network.
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Network theory for data-driven epistasis networks.
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Epistasis analysis using multifactor dimensionality reduction.
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Epistasis Analysis Using ReliefF
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Epistasis analysis using artificial intelligence.
Attention for Chapter 14: Genome-wide epistasis and pleiotropy characterized by the bipartite human phenotype network.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Genome-wide epistasis and pleiotropy characterized by the bipartite human phenotype network.
Chapter number 14
Book title
Epistasis
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, November 2014
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-2155-3_14
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-2154-6, 978-1-4939-2155-3
Authors

Darabos C, Moore JH, Christian Darabos, Jason H. Moore, Darabos, Christian, Moore, Jason H.

Abstract

Networks are central to turning the colossal amount of information generated by high-throughput genetic technology into manageable sources of knowledge. They are an intuitive way of representing interaction data, yet they offer a full set of sophisticated quantitative tools to analyze the phenomena they model. When combining genetic information, diseases, and phenotypic traits, networks can reveal and facilitate the analysis of pleiotropic and epistatic effects at the genome-wide scale. Genome-wide association study data is publicly available, and so are gene and pathway databases, and many more, making the global overview next to impossible. Networks allow information from these multiple sources to be encompassed. We use connections between the strata of the network to characterize pleiotropy and epistasis effects taking place between traits and biological pathways. The global graph-theory-based quantitative methods reveal that levels of pleiotropy and epistasis are in-line with theoretical expectations. The results of the magnified "glaucoma" region of the network confirm the existence of well-documented interactions, supported by overlapping genes and biological pathways and more obscure associations. They have the potential to generate new hypotheses for yet uncharacterized interactions. As the amount and complexity of genetic data increase, bipartite and, more generally, multipartite networks that combine human diseases and other physical attributes with layers of genetic information have the potential to become ubiquitous tools in the study of complex genetic, phenotypic interactions, and possibly improve personalized medicine.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 7%
Denmark 1 7%
Unknown 12 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 36%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 29%
Student > Master 1 7%
Unknown 4 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 14%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 7%
Social Sciences 1 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 4 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2015.
All research outputs
#17,745,035
of 22,787,797 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,213
of 13,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#247,844
of 362,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#437
of 1,033 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,787,797 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,094 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,126 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,033 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.