↓ Skip to main content

Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Approaches to Detect PARP-1 Activation In Vivo, In Situ, and In Vitro
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Quantification of Poly(ADP-Ribose) In Vitro: Determination of the ADP-Ribose Chain Length and Branching Pattern
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Assay for Protein Modification by Poly-ADP-Ribose In Vitro
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Identification of Distinct Amino Acids as ADP-Ribose Acceptor Sites by Mass Spectrometry
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Noncovalent Protein Interaction with Poly(ADP-Ribose)
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Noncovalent pADPr Interaction with Proteins and Competition with RNA for Binding to Proteins
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Affinity-based assays for the identification and quantitative evaluation of noncovalent poly(ADP-ribose)-binding proteins.
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Detecting and Quantifying pADPr In Vivo
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Purification of Recombinant Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerases
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Methods for purification of proteins associated with cellular poly(ADP-ribose) and PARP-specific poly(ADP-ribose).
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Purification and Characterization of Poly(ADP-Ribosyl)ated DNA Replication/Repair Complexes
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 PARP1 Genomics: Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Approach Using Anti-PARP1 Antibody (ChIP and ChIP-seq)
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Purification of Human PARP-1 and PARP-1 Domains from Escherichia coli for Structural and Biochemical Analysis
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Regulation of Chromatin Structure by PARP-1
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 The Use of PARP Inhibitors in Cancer Therapy: Use as Adjuvant with Chemotherapy or Radiotherapy; Use as a Single Agent in Susceptible Patients; Techniques Used to Identify Susceptible Patients
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Quantification of PARP Activity in Human Tissues: Ex Vivo Assays in Blood Cells and Immunohistochemistry in Human Biopsies
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Assays for hypermethylation of the BRCA1 gene promoter in tumor cells to predict sensitivity to PARP-inhibitor therapy.
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Generation of Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation Deficient Mutants of the Transcription Factor, CTCF.
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Phenotypic Characterization of Parp-1 and Parp-2 Deficient Mice and Cells
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation Pathways in Mammals: The Advantage of Murine PARG Null Mutation
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Genetic Approaches to Targeting Multiple PARP Genes in a Mammalian Genome
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Approaches to Separate and Identify PolyADP-Ribosylated Proteins Using Poly(ADP-Ribose) Glycohydrolase-Knockout Drosophila
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Immunolocalization of Poly ADP-Ribose on Drosophila Polytene Chromosomes
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 The Immunodetection of pADPr in Drosophila Tissues: Immunostaining of Thick Sections; Immuno-EM
  26. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 25 Poly(ADP-Ribose) Metabolism Analysis in the Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans
  27. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 26 Genetic Dissection of PARylation in the Filamentous Fungus Neurospora crassa
  28. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 27 Purification of the Poly-ADP-Ribose Polymerase-Like Thermozyme from the Archaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus
  29. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 28 Strategies Employed for the Development of PARP Inhibitors
  30. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 29 Small-Molecule Collection and High-Throughput Colorimetric Assay to Identify PARP1 Inhibitors
  31. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 30 Purification of the Poly-ADP-Ribose Polymerase-Like Thermozyme from the Archaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus
Attention for Chapter 18: Generation of Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation Deficient Mutants of the Transcription Factor, CTCF.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Generation of Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation Deficient Mutants of the Transcription Factor, CTCF.
Chapter number 18
Book title
Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2011
DOI 10.1007/978-1-61779-270-0_18
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-61779-269-4, 978-1-61779-270-0
Authors

Dawn Farrar, Igor Chernukhin, Elena Klenova, Farrar, Dawn, Chernukhin, Igor, Klenova, Elena

Abstract

Generation of the mutated versions of proteins deficient for poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation (PARylation) is a major challenge because there is no clearly defined consensus site for PARylation. In this chapter, we describe possible strategies to produce such mutants, demonstrated by the example of CTCF, a transcription factor. To achieve this in our study, the protein domain modified by PARylation was mapped and the amino acids, which can be potentially PARylated, selected. Mutations of such individual amino acids as either single or combinatorial mutations were introduced by site-directed mutagenesis, using mutagenic primers and the wild-type sequences as a template. Mutants were validated by DNA sequencing and assessed for the presence of the PARylation mark. The latter was achieved by ectopic expression of mutated proteins in cells, followed by immunoprecipitation with the polyclonal anti-PAR antibody and Western analysis with a protein-specific antibody. The PARylation-deficient CTCF mutant was identified and compared with the wild-type protein. Based on several general characteristics (nuclear distribution/localisation, stability and levels of expression in the cell), the PARylation-deficient mutant was comparable with the wild-type CTCF.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 14%
Unknown 12 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 36%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 21%
Professor 2 14%
Lecturer 1 7%
Student > Postgraduate 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 43%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 36%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 7%
Unknown 1 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2019.
All research outputs
#17,646,807
of 22,651,245 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,121
of 13,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,464
of 180,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#164
of 229 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,651,245 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,012 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 229 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.