↓ Skip to main content

Combined chemosensitivity and chromatin profiling prioritizes drug combinations in CLL

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Chemical Biology, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
13 news outlets
twitter
22 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Combined chemosensitivity and chromatin profiling prioritizes drug combinations in CLL
Published in
Nature Chemical Biology, January 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41589-018-0205-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christian Schmidl, Gregory I. Vladimer, André F. Rendeiro, Susanne Schnabl, Thomas Krausgruber, Christina Taubert, Nikolaus Krall, Tea Pemovska, Mohammad Araghi, Berend Snijder, Rainer Hubmann, Anna Ringler, Kathrin Runggatscher, Dita Demirtas, Oscar Lopez de la Fuente, Martin Hilgarth, Cathrin Skrabs, Edit Porpaczy, Michaela Gruber, Gregor Hoermann, Stefan Kubicek, Philipp B. Staber, Medhat Shehata, Giulio Superti-Furga, Ulrich Jäger, Christoph Bock

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 140 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 19%
Researcher 25 18%
Student > Master 16 11%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Other 9 6%
Other 22 16%
Unknown 30 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 52 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 4%
Chemistry 5 4%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 33 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 110. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2021.
All research outputs
#408,504
of 26,556,730 outputs
Outputs from Nature Chemical Biology
#164
of 3,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,940
of 452,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Chemical Biology
#1
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,556,730 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,546 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,496 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.