@KuypersMarieke @willemsen_gj Je zegt toch dat alleen IARC glyfosaat als kankerverwekkend ziet, of begrijp ik je dan verkeerd? Want dat zou gewoon niet waar zijn. https://t.co/0YHsYmrzuP
RT @hira__lena: glifosat bazlı herbisite maruz kalma ile Hodgkin dışı lenfoma riskinin artması arasında bir bağlantı olduğunu göstermekted…
glifosat bazlı herbisite maruz kalma ile Hodgkin dışı lenfoma riskinin artması arasında bir bağlantı olduğunu göstermektedir. https://t.co/OoG0Y8oANd
@SnowdenBishop
@ModelAyshaMirza I'm concerned about the risk of non-Hodgkins lymphoma among applicators and glyphosate exposure. https://t.co/zs8m068aIS
The most recent meta-analysis published in 2019, states that there is a compelling link between non-Hodgkins lymphoma and glyphosate. #lymfeklierkanker https://t.co/38FtBC8nqS
@PedroPerezRol @agaviriau No así no se hace en ciencia. https://t.co/rhiKaUwKd7 https://t.co/TD8hSjh98j https://t.co/ZMTncoT3W3 Hay asociación a disminución de parámetros en mujeres en embarazo y asociación a linfoma no hodking con metanalisis incluid
As more glyphosate studies have emerge we’re learning of a myriad of health concerns, including an added risk for antimicrobial resistance 🧵 https://t.co/4pS9EwAEYs
@UsViolations glyphosate was found to have an increase risk of NHL in a study after the IARC classification, and the glyphosate shills are criticizing the IARC. https://t.co/kvyI16U1jj
@WAJ_Webster @Saralimback Actually there is new research which shows there is a 41% increase risk in getting non-Hodgkinson lymphoma from Glyphosate. https://t.co/H0bpGxw7oG
@IkmEmma @_ilestlor @CerveauxNon @jomodemo La seul méta analyses notifiant une hausse (5 cas pour 100000 usagers), le fait dans une utilisation illégal des doses (doses les plus hautes enregistrée) https://t.co/M3PtvpJwW7 Bonne lecture
@Hugues @super_sophiee 2/2 PS ton étude 🇺🇸 est de 2017. En 2019, une contre-étude a démontré que les utilisateurs réguliers de Roundup avait 41% de chance de plus de développer un lymphome. https://t.co/wNcwEDvifl
@Tardisius @krees34 @marinetondelier @franceinter Le problème du glyphosate, c'est pas sa dangerosité au niveau de la santé ? Y comprit pour les agriculteurs ? https://t.co/2ywvkK5o86 https://t.co/Gq3jDcdDJS https://t.co/XZOufqq33I
@JunkScience There are now many studies linking glyphosate to cancer. This meta study showed a 41% increase in lymphoma https://t.co/5xPMeVZ4g6 https://t.co/K2MQss6eNm
@LeeKurtiss @rolloburner @EthicalSkeptic @ChrisManc9 @DowdEdward Sure it is, in the right dosage https://t.co/mkwr8aMQik Helps other things grow too https://t.co/Ds2pfN7zQS https://t.co/SzY5c9c5XG
@CDisco5 @simonmaechling Legitimate health pros don’t rely on agro regulators for health info. Their info for glyphosate/ GBHs came from Monsanto <- found guilty of malice & oppression of info. We rely on science research, data, RCTS, meta analysis
Long thread of science research on glyphosate / Roundup health harms & risks:
@GMWatch @euronews @sabine_38 Glyphosate & its re to health studies increased post IARC “probable carcinogen” classification & the guilty Monsanto/Bayer guilty verdicts. The world saw the dirty antics used by Monsanto to get regulator approval. A
Epidemiyolojik çalışmalardan elde edilen kanıtlar, glifosat bazlı herbisite maruz kalma ile Hodgkin dışı lenfoma riskinin artması arasında zorlayıcı bir bağlantı olduğunu göstermektedir. https://t.co/OoG0Y8oANd
12/31 https://t.co/me5l590gXc
Using the highest exposure groups when available in each study, we report the overall meta-relative risk (meta-RR) of NHL in GBH-exposed individuals was increased by 41% (meta-RR = 1.41, 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.13-1.75) https://t.co/n4SucV0wMk
@MacLesggy 🙄 Études financées par les industriels et validées par l'Europe. Ainsi un produit tue-vie tue-tout serait innofensif pour nous (peut être ne sommes nous plus en vie remarque?). Ci-après d autres études, non financées par les industriels 👇 https:
10/16 En 2019, une méta-analyse américaine a calculé qu'il y avait une augmentation de 41 % du risque de développer un cancer du système immunitaire chez les personnes travaillant en contact avec des herbicides à base de glyphosate. https://t.co/VpeCviTPDM
@Cobra_FX_ Durant le Covid le lobbying pharma à explosé aux yeux de tous, scandale The Lancet et l'argent omniprésent à tous les niveaux de la santé. Mais cela n'a pas suffit. Les lobbying sont encore tabou, comment vous prendre au sérieux? https://t.co/lb
@plantparadise7 Yes, glyophosate-based chemicals can increase the risk of non-Hodgkins lymphoma. https://t.co/Cl8UUbTbeq
RT @GMOFreeUSA: Glyphosate and its metabolites persist in food [[5], [6], [7]], water [8], and dust [9], potentially indicating that everyo…
RT @GMOFreeUSA: Glyphosate and its metabolites persist in food [[5], [6], [7]], water [8], and dust [9], potentially indicating that everyo…
RT @artepierre: 8/14 D’autres études pointent des effets possibles de l’exposition au #glyphosate pour les humains et le vivant. L’@Inserm…
RT @artepierre: 8/14 D’autres études pointent des effets possibles de l’exposition au #glyphosate pour les humains et le vivant. L’@Inserm…
RT @artepierre: 8/14 D’autres études pointent des effets possibles de l’exposition au #glyphosate pour les humains et le vivant. L’@Inserm…
@SylvainGoiran @AtheeIV @pierreniney J'ai par exemple cette meta-analyse qui trouve un risque accru de lymphome non hodgkinien. Encore une fois, ça ne veut pas dire qu'il faut abandonner le produit, car les alternatives sont probablement pires. https://t.
@Kopecz93 @pierreniney Il n'y a pas de consensus scientifique en la matière 👇. Donc affirmer que le glyphosate "ne pose aucun risque sanitaire" est un peu fort de café. https://t.co/jEQ38z1MZ1
8/14 D’autres études pointent des effets possibles de l’exposition au #glyphosate pour les humains et le vivant. L’@Inserm souligne un lien statistique possible au cancer lymphatique : https://t.co/b9RysAYLGS https://t.co/oRGCOEBPLv https://t.co/53aUn6eWA
@_APWK_ time. https://t.co/wYoyFEWEwp https://t.co/MaKcmGecEh https://t.co/VPwoILJAoB https://t.co/vJsq1ISA9d https://t.co/B3y4qPvDXp All this is apparently not allowed to be told to the people, because otherwise the pharmaceutical lobby would no l
@Azadeth311 @Quasargoon_ @lporiginalg CaN yoU PrOOvE tHat?! What are you a spokesperson for Bayer or something? It’s ok that you’re ignorant about the shtty food supply bro. https://t.co/bpQV0guiXB
@bambkb You can remove weedkillers from fruit and veg easily using bicarbonate of soda. Soak for 15 mins in a teaspoon of bicarb and then rinse thoroughly. I do a final rinse in filtered water https://t.co/8qeINWh6DK
@daniel_corcos Vous savez personne ne doit de réponse à personne. En l'occurrence, cette étude est prise en compte par les différentes méta-analyses que j'ai déjà eu l'occasion de citer. https://t.co/oSoI2ufvHm
RT @Matadon_: En tant qu'amoureux de la science vous avez pas pu le rater, une nouvelle méta-analyse reprend l'AHS et en conclut un risque…
@IngeStolkenburg Herkenbaar verhaal, ik heb ook vaak achter op die trekker gezeten en zag hoe de boerenzoon knalgele armen had. Zelf heb ik lymfeklierkanker gehad, van een type dat gelinkt wordt aan glyfosaat. https://t.co/yBE7JAUnz4
@JunkScience Safe except for the 43% increased risk of cancer? 🤓 https://t.co/2wPBjcZkwK
@bert_db Bedankt Bert, je hebt gelijk, ik heb mijn huiswerk niet zo goed gedaan. Vermoedelijk baseert Avaaz zich op deze studie van de Universiteit van Washington uit 2019, maar die lijkt me niet zo sluitend te zijn. Ik ga mijn tweet vervangen. https://
@nahtanoj1971 @Conservatives The only reason it wasn't banned in the UK in Dec 2022 was because of Brexit, epidemiological studies supported the notion that glyphosate can cause cancer in humans! Science not the bogeyman carried out said studies! https://
@Ratoffline @BayerDialog Quelle oder laberst du nur Müll ? Hier ein paar Studien die beweisen das Glyphosat krebserregend ist: https://t.co/S9yMNSNyLU https://t.co/bLUkD2OsOq
@JunkScience Milloy pretends to be a medical scientist. Glyphosate is a potential carcinogen that persists in the environment: https://t.co/jRQkm3YsyL https://t.co/fvGnqygB8D https://t.co/HyrXBE2H6R https://t.co/K6agU78DOc
@Speedrock54 @jdv_vv JAWEL DAAR IS WEL BEWIJS VAN. https://t.co/9RTQsqmgd3 Let nou eens op!?🥺 We hebben keihard actie gevoerd, jarenlang, tegen die Monsanto/BAYER/Syngenta multinationals. Met dezelfde superrijke eigenaren die nu net doen alsof ze "groen" z
@kevinfolta @LilHexico @paulsaladinomd https://t.co/jbWQAb7IXZ "Overall, ... our current meta-analysis of human epidemiological studies suggests a compelling link between exposures to Glyphosate Based Herbicides and increased risk for non-Hodgkin lymphoma
@beautyinarose @danyscht Peor! Dijeron que no llegaba a los cuerpos. Ya se sabe que produce daño genético y por consiguiente enfermedades. https://t.co/RljwZL0ioW https://t.co/azAyRDOSEl
@365nutrition هذي مراجعة منهجية من 2018، وجدت ارتفاع نسبة الاصابة بسرطان الغدد اللمفاوية https://t.co/6unOMXi6Rp
@kcisney @TheNutrivore Depends on risks we take Studies on glyphosate & health were gathered for nursing students in a zoom meeting. Following the science of prevention is key in protecting health by our own lifestyles. No guarantees. ie can’t prev
@MisteurBin @ame_litte @jrseihgstein @pierrelagrange8 @tatiann69922625 https://t.co/UIMFIfHbr4 donc 5 sources scientifiques que vous n'êtes visiblement pas en capacité de comprendre, c'est n'importe quoi? Affirmer des choses c'est bien beau, mais vous avez
@MisteurBin @ame_litte @jrseihgstein @pierrelagrange8 Le premier est un beau sophisme. Le deuxième je crois vous avoir fournit assez de sources sur ces "conneries" comme vous dites. https://t.co/kzJNgYfQxO
@dgjewel @Sharethwealth @LuchG2 Glyphosate is applied and has a low toxicity for people. To get cancer from it, you have to be overexposed for a long time. Usually, lymphoma associated with high-dose exposure to herbicide takes at least two years to deve
@saphorocoeur @Raphael_Valette Sauf que c’est à chaque fois le même type de cancer, (lymphome non hodgkinien LNH) et le même type d’exposition. Plus d’un milliers de victimes différentes. Et si, vous mentez, des études le prouvent, comme celle-ci : https:/
@GeorgeMonbiot There is no such thing as a billionaire philanthropists. https://t.co/gfWdVmqOpH GMO increases cancer, allergies and is detrimental to bees whereas small scale subsistence and sustainable farming is better for the environment. https://
RT @JoanElizShields: Ask youself, When someone who’s enjoyed years of free: airline travel car rentals hotels food and $600/hr to represen…
Ask youself, When someone who’s enjoyed years of free: airline travel car rentals hotels food and $600/hr to represent agro interests… then claims the science of these studies ( 🧵) are useless… DO YOU TRUST THE SCIENTIST OR THE SCIENCE:
RT @JoanElizShields: @HealthRadix @EPA @USDA Here is a thread of studies re Glyphosate & its harm. These are significant. Never let anyone…
@greenfork @JimSatone @vixenvalentino @EuropePAN They’re right here - where you decided to ignore them when I sent this thread to you, earlier #DAF 😂😂😂
RT @JoanElizShields: @HealthRadix @EPA @USDA Here is a thread of studies re Glyphosate & its harm. These are significant. Never let anyone…
@HealthRadix @EPA @USDA Here is a thread of studies re Glyphosate & its harm. These are significant. Never let anyone tell you there is no evidence for glyphosate harm
@AgBioWorld @agnostoxxx @chateaubxl @brishtirnuri @stuartsmyth66 @greenfork @FarmingFutureBD This found a 41% increase as well as other health problems. https://t.co/blkg8HX3xJ
@Hiddemhigh Hoe kijk je naar dit soort studies? https://t.co/Bjjpaaojsc
RT @TheEndisFar: @MartinTruther @RobertWager1 @PaulRoundy1 Non Hodgkin's Lymphoma https://t.co/VjB4UrbwhO
@MartinTruther @RobertWager1 @PaulRoundy1 Non Hodgkin's Lymphoma https://t.co/VjB4UrbwhO
@kevinfolta @RobertKennedyJr @joerogan I’ll let the many lawsuits that are ongoing take care of that but I’d start at the meta analysis. Denmark has declared it a carcinogen. Suddenly, celiac and gluten sentivities have risen. There’s a boatload of issues
katkıda bulunuyor. üreticileri, düzenleyicileri ve savunucuları kabul edeceklerdir. https://t.co/OoG0Y8oANd
RT @JoanElizShields: @mbalter @Bayer 30 studies on the risks and harms of glyphosate that I have saved. Most if not all were published aft…
@TheFranklinSyn1 @MLiamMcCollum You said a lot of nonsense and seem to use “conspiracy theory” as a gotcha to discredit those whom you disagree with ideologically. I’ll just leave this here: https://t.co/2FP0r4V5OM And this https://t.co/icYCuvrHvx
@Aceofspades256 @petenick7 @stopthespraybc @CaulfieldTim Plus this meta-analysis. The fact that glyphosate use has increased so much is also significant. https://t.co/gGoWHguEhj
Roundup Herbisit, Düzenleyicilerin Söylediğinden 125 Kat Daha Zehirli https://t.co/OoG0Y8oANd
@NAO34_7012 @5_daime_lon あなたのお気持ちは関係ないです 農薬により発がん性リスク41%上昇という論文とあなたのお考えどちらを重視するか答えは明白です https://t.co/xT9NkrHu9f
@5_daime_lon 根拠にならない? 農薬による健康被害論文は山のようにあるのに?そして事の発端、自分の発言は棚に上げて? メリットが消費者目線ではないねえ現に無農薬野菜も供給されていますし😊農薬による癌のリスク41%増加論文くっつけとくから学んどいて https://t.co/xT9NkrHu9f https://t.co/R4WT92Bz6E
Can the increased rates of diseases like cancer and obesity in the US since the 1980s be caused by vegetable oils from soybean, canola, corn, and cottonseed oils, all GMOs, and sprayed with Roundup (glyphosate) on these crops? Science says: Yes! https://
RT @JoanElizShields: @greenfork @vixenvalentino @EuropePAN Here you go. I don’t trust any licensed HCW if they read these studies and find…
RT @JoanElizShields: @mbalter @Bayer 30 studies on the risks and harms of glyphosate that I have saved. Most if not all were published aft…
@thackerpd @stkirsch I wouldn’t share anything Seneff says re vaccines/autism. Folta denying earning $$$ outside of UF, while earning $600/hr to defend Bayer in a lawsuit, while also working on an experiment involving Bayer corn= epitome of fraud Glyph
@NovaMarkButler @greenfork You ask questions… they ignore you 😂 This is a thread that Arpita ignored- It’s studies on glyphosate and offers some insight on we recommend avoiding it:
RT @JimSatone: Exposure to Glyphosate-Based Herbicides and Risk for Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Meta-Analysis and Supporting Evidence ... https…
Exposure to Glyphosate-Based Herbicides and Risk for Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Meta-Analysis and Supporting Evidence ... https://t.co/I6lxK5VYKa
@Jacques3Riv @benoitm_mtl @ThomasGerbet Les fermiers ont 41% plus de risque de developer un NHL . C'est excellent ça!! Ça va faire les journaux à potin comme NYT, va y avoir des lawsuit Américain. Mais faut pas boire l'herbicide non-plus... On s'entend que
@greenfork @vixenvalentino @EuropePAN Here you go. I don’t trust any licensed HCW if they read these studies and find glyphosate is worth the risk: https://t.co/PPoF0mOk6U… https://t.co/zKIopVCJrL https://t.co/bmOEytfxEg
@30ASeawitch @drdrew As of last year it was banned in at least 10 countries. It’s a carcinogen, it’s an endocrine disruptor, and since it’s an antibiotic it also destroys beneficial bacteria in the gut biome. https://t.co/WGkRSj7i9Z
Comme tous les scientifiques qui prétendent que le glyphosate est inaufensif ! Oui il y a des scientifiques véreux !
@vbenard @guy3810 @afis_science L'AFIS ce repaire de faux-scientifiques. Voiciune méta-analyse de 2019 (après l'article de l'AFIS donc par charité je ne leur en tiens pas rigueur) https://t.co/JgIEsog1Yd
@KorstiaanP @joostvkasteren Ik heb het onderzoek erbij gehaald, genoemd in het artikel in Nature (60), dat verwijst naar het Non-Hodgkin onderzoek. (GBH=Glyphosate-based herbicide) Dan zie ik dit, wat toch een andere conclusie lijkt.👇 https://t.co/pDuKY2G8