You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Is interval training the magic bullet for fat loss? A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing moderate-intensity continuous training with high-intensity interval training (HIIT)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of Sports Medicine, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bjsports-2018-099928 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ricardo Borges Viana, João Pedro Araújo Naves, Victor Silveira Coswig, Claudio Andre Barbosa de Lira, James Steele, James Peter Fisher, Paulo Gentil |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 755 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 125 | 17% |
| United States | 99 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 40 | 5% |
| Canada | 19 | 3% |
| Mexico | 15 | 2% |
| Australia | 14 | 2% |
| Brazil | 11 | 1% |
| Argentina | 11 | 1% |
| Japan | 11 | 1% |
| Other | 128 | 17% |
| Unknown | 282 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 559 | 74% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 103 | 14% |
| Scientists | 86 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 624 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 624 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 103 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 97 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 52 | 8% |
| Other | 40 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 33 | 5% |
| Other | 133 | 21% |
| Unknown | 166 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 185 | 30% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 78 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 71 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 22 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 3% |
| Other | 47 | 8% |
| Unknown | 200 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1156. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2024.
All research outputs
#12,906
of 25,805,386 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Sports Medicine
#43
of 6,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#218
of 461,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Sports Medicine
#1
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,805,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,567 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 461,210 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.