The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Impact of alternative reimbursement strategies in the new cooperative medical scheme on caesarean delivery rates: a mixed-method study in rural China
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, July 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-12-217 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kun Huang, Fangbiao Tao, Lennart Bogg, Shenglan Tang |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 118 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 20 | 17% |
Student > Master | 20 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 9% |
Other | 8 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 4% |
Other | 24 | 20% |
Unknown | 32 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 25% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 14% |
Social Sciences | 10 | 8% |
Psychology | 5 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
Other | 18 | 15% |
Unknown | 36 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2018.
All research outputs
#7,472,947
of 22,846,662 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#3,708
of 7,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,655
of 164,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#60
of 128 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,846,662 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,641 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,760 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 128 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.