You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Factors affecting species richness and distribution spatially and temporally within a protected area using multi‐season occupancy models
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Animal Conservation, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1111/acv.12491 |
| Authors |
J. F. Moore, J. E. Hines, F. Mulindahabi, M. K. Masozera |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 36% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| Nepal | 1 | 7% |
| Rwanda | 1 | 7% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 57% |
| Scientists | 5 | 36% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 69 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 28% |
| Researcher | 18 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 6 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 25 | 36% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 30% |
| Psychology | 2 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 14 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2019.
All research outputs
#3,571,655
of 22,985,065 outputs
Outputs from Animal Conservation
#475
of 1,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,204
of 352,694 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Conservation
#14
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,985,065 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,230 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,694 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.