The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Geologic map of the Island of Hawaii
|
---|---|
Published in |
US Geological Survey, January 1996
|
DOI | 10.3133/i2524a |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 6% |
United States | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 16 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 11% |
Student > Master | 2 | 11% |
Unspecified | 2 | 11% |
Other | 6 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 8 | 44% |
Unspecified | 4 | 22% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 17% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 11% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 6% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2019.
All research outputs
#7,585,824
of 23,132,033 outputs
Outputs from US Geological Survey
#612
of 2,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,936
of 79,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age from US Geological Survey
#7
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,132,033 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,164 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 79,841 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.