The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) safe metal braided catheter design for interventional CMR at 1.5 T: freedom from radiofrequency induced heating and preserved mechanical performance
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, March 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12968-019-0526-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Korel D. Yildirim, Burcu Basar, A.E. Campbell-Washburn, Daniel A. Herzka, Ozgur Kocaturk, Robert J. Lederman |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 67% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 13% |
Student > Master | 3 | 13% |
Researcher | 2 | 8% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 13% |
Unknown | 10 | 42% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 9 | 38% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 4% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 12 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2019.
All research outputs
#16,704,188
of 26,312,176 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#1,012
of 1,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#215,519
of 369,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#16
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,312,176 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,394 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,190 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.