↓ Skip to main content

Antiquity of forelimb ecomorphological diversity in the mammalian stem lineage (Synapsida)

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
13 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
112 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
1 Redditor
video
2 video uploaders

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Antiquity of forelimb ecomorphological diversity in the mammalian stem lineage (Synapsida)
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, March 2019
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1802543116
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jacqueline K. Lungmus, Kenneth D. Angielczyk

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 112 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 29%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Researcher 2 10%
Professor 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 38%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 19%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Unknown 7 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 173. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2021.
All research outputs
#163,138
of 20,785,366 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#3,392
of 94,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,396
of 333,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#84
of 1,083 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,785,366 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 94,955 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,735 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,083 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.