↓ Skip to main content

Access to general practitioner services amongst underserved Australians: a microsimulation study

Overview of attention for article published in Human Resources for Health, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Access to general practitioner services amongst underserved Australians: a microsimulation study
Published in
Human Resources for Health, January 2012
DOI 10.1186/1478-4491-10-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Deborah J Schofield, Rupendra N Shrestha, Emily J Callander

Abstract

One group often identified as having low socioeconomic status, those living in remote or rural areas, are often recognised as bearing an unequal burden of illness in society. This paper aims to examine equity of utilisation of general practitioner services in Australia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 3%
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 33 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 14%
Researcher 4 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Other 10 29%
Unknown 6 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 40%
Social Sciences 4 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 6 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2013.
All research outputs
#1,621,969
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Human Resources for Health
#142
of 1,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,972
of 251,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Resources for Health
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,997 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.