↓ Skip to main content

Contraceptive Justice: Why We Need a Male Pill

Overview of attention for article published in The AMA Journal of Ethic, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
14 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
45 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Contraceptive Justice: Why We Need a Male Pill
Published in
The AMA Journal of Ethic, February 2012
DOI 10.1001/virtualmentor.2012.14.2.msoc1-1202
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lisa Campo-Engelstein

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 75 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 28%
Student > Master 8 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Researcher 4 5%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 23 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 9%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Arts and Humanities 3 4%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 26 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 153. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2024.
All research outputs
#283,643
of 26,316,370 outputs
Outputs from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#81
of 2,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,472
of 257,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#4
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,316,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,811 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,463 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.