↓ Skip to main content

Relative efficacy of interventions in the treatment of second-line non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Relative efficacy of interventions in the treatment of second-line non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Published in
BMC Cancer, April 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12885-019-5569-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adrian D. Vickers, Katherine B. Winfree, Gebra Cuyun Carter, Urpo Kiiskinen, Min-Hua Jen, Donald Stull, James A. Kaye, David P. Carbone

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 16%
Other 10 14%
Student > Postgraduate 7 10%
Student > Master 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 23 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 36%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 22 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2022.
All research outputs
#6,719,817
of 21,419,046 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#1,794
of 7,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,475
of 289,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,419,046 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,736 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,627 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them