@covid19_hgi @ceclindgren P-values do not indicate effect size or importance. Here's my attempt at re-doing a manhattan plot for hospitalised vs non-hospitalised, showing "sign(beta) * abs(beta) - 1.96 * beta_sd" as the statistic, and excluding anything t
@frank_pinter @stephkestelman @DinaPomeranz iirc econometrica and aer will no longer have stars in accordance with https://t.co/PeUHawXJN8
RT @jasonmlindo: If you like this piece on framing tests of stat sig (as I do), check out this ASA statement from '16. I especially like Pr…
RT @jasonmlindo: If you like this piece on framing tests of stat sig (as I do), check out this ASA statement from '16. I especially like Pr…
RT @jasonmlindo: If you like this piece on framing tests of stat sig (as I do), check out this ASA statement from '16. I especially like Pr…
RT @jasonmlindo: If you like this piece on framing tests of stat sig (as I do), check out this ASA statement from '16. I especially like Pr…
If you like this piece on framing tests of stat sig (as I do), check out this ASA statement from '16. I especially like Principle 3: researchers should consider the totality of evidence in making inferences, including other studies! #NoOneStudyIsDefinitive
5- Yani doğru hatırlıyorsam, herkesin (herkes derken büyük çoğunluk) p<0.05'te oluyor zannettiği şey, p<0.001 civarı oluyor aslında. ASA (American Statistical Assoc.) yanlış kullanılan p olayı ile ilgili koca bir açıklama yayınladı: https://t.co/msIN
@black_akkadian @roodmood123 @khalideljaaly @NEJM One starting place: https://t.co/nkflMzEebX
There are sometimes I think P-values should be banned since I don't think they are used properly. This article helps with that https://t.co/244UuyTAEB #biostatistics #medicine #medschool #residency #tutor #USMLE #MCCQE1 #exams
The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose https://t.co/Ie8iDbqHhv
@Blooshier @mp3michael @erikbryn Yet another person who doesn't understand the difference between statistical significance and effect size. People might want to read the guidance from the American Statistical Association: https://t.co/29cgaTgcda
@FromPhDtoLife An unfortunate term meaning that the probability of the observed evidence (or a stronger trend) occurring by chance < 5%. Statisticians recommend that this probability (the p value) be interpreted without an arbitrary cutoff (https://t.co
18/ Consider the definition and proper usage of p-values from this REALLY IMPORTANT PAPER. Full article: The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose https://t.co/aufgz77PR7 https://t.co/wNxpPJU38M
The ASA's Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose ¿Por qué tanta gente todavía usa p = 0.05? 👇 https://t.co/ouHMxOTAWd
8. Se puede discutir el uso de la p y su errada interpretación en muchos escenarios, pero no con los resultados puntuales de un estudio, menos con un valor 0.059 que no está ni siquiera cerca a la significancia y con un análisis interino! https://t.co/i0r7
RT @MayoMN_IMRES: 3/ ➡️Statistical significance: p < 0.05 (commonly). This does NOT mean the probability the conclusion is false is <5%!…
3/ ➡️Statistical significance: p < 0.05 (commonly). This does NOT mean the probability the conclusion is false is <5%! See this article from @Amstatnews on guiding principles for p-value use (this is a game changer article people): https://t.co/iun
@jw_lockhart On another note, I have a very difficult time explaining p values even to trained social scientists... I send them the American Statistical Association paper about it, but that does not work, generally. https://t.co/ZbtVJxcboW
Lisez aussi cet article qui contredit bcp de sophismes Raoultiens. https://t.co/oL6CgsShgb
@BabaYuuusha اگه علاقه داشتی میتونی اين بيانيهی کوتاه ASA رو بخونی. معمول نيست بيانيه يا گايدلاين بدن مگه اينکه قضيه خيلی جدی باشه: https://t.co/Z6gymx2ZuO "It's science's dirtiest secret: The ‘scientific method’ of testing hypotheses by statistical ana
RT @B_Tomasik: @piet_ost @drdavidpalma They would not be definitive even when p<0.005. Highly recommend ASA statement which lists 6 princip…
Full article: The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose https://t.co/dfAz4M5UIE
@piet_ost @drdavidpalma They would not be definitive even when p<0.005. Highly recommend ASA statement which lists 6 principles: https://t.co/2rE6WAXEUS We need phase III data and it's great that it's already launched.
@lakens Given the trend in statistics away from obsession with p-values and to prevent the misinterpretation your view fosters, I don’t think NEJM or other major journals will be reporting exact values any time soon. https://t.co/LLtDzniFAX
科学的結論ならびに事業または方針の決定は #p値 が特定の閾値を超えたかどうかのみに基づいてはならない：科学的な主張や結論を正当化するために機械的で明確な境界線によりデータ分析や科学的推論を軽減させる実践は間違った信念や不十分な意思決定につながる可能性がある。 https://t.co/HtWkyA1F5X
論説：P値に関するアメリカ統計学会の説明 2016 〜 但し『#P値』は定評のある研究者であっても理解および解釈することが困難である 〜 https://t.co/7LrMYoqbp5
p値に関するASA声明文：文脈・過程・目的 2016 #アメリカ統計学会 (@AmstatNews) #RonaldWasserstein (@Ron_Wasserstein) #統計学的有意性 #P値 https://t.co/9wASNAAstB
『3. 科学的な結論や、ビジネス、政策における決定は、#P値 がある値（訳注: #有意水準）を超えたかどうかにのみ基づくべきではない。』
@frod_san @rstats4ds Unfortunate that it includes "significance" wording though... https://t.co/K8dut818Nz
@gensokyo0326 P hackingは生命科学にたずさわる者なら知っておくべき内容だと思います (悪用出来ると論文を出しやすいから)。 https://t.co/esqdGmaPh0
@Benny_dubs @J_Corky We use it as a binary interpretation, but that’s not how the tool is supposed to be used https://t.co/ywN8DQxuJy
That's a mouthful! But is it really better than the definition of p-value offered by @AmstatNews? https://t.co/Q1Jh03oW9X https://t.co/DkE4joTBDh
@LWestafer @ellis_muggleton @PulmCrit @AnnalsofEM Whilst we are at it @LWestafer can we dispell the p value = statistical significance myth once and for all. The ASA have tried to tell us twice with specific statement paper's on the matter. Like this htt
@LaraPivodic @eolc_research You can always refer them to the American Statistical Association's statement on p-values (top: principle n°2 is key) https://t.co/bzaTIW0OE8
A great supplementary read to this editorial is 'The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose'. https://t.co/STyE0PjGxx "A p-value, or statistical significance, does not measure the size of an effect or the importance of a result."
7. The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose #365papers https://t.co/ay9YUYa4nk
@PeterKilmarx @terraxa1 @MinistryofIndoc @BhumbleHaveF8h @MaimedMann @DanguardThuum @DrTinari @IntactByDefault @Mindofown @WHO @AHRI_News @ftanser @LLopezGonzalez @inaskosana @TheLancet The trial began with an initial sample size of less than 1000 (relativ
Very much enjoyed hearing @Ron_Wasserstein speak about a world beyond p < .05 at @Baylor. Planning to read the ASA's 2016 statement on p-values and their implications for science. https://t.co/b8Jj3P3uLR
@SinanAlper_ NHST popperyan yanlislamacilik midir konusuna artik yoruldugum icin girmeyecegim ama su da burada dursun https://t.co/Acu16KXW4s -p degeri nedir ne degildir hakkinda ASA task force aciklamasi
RT @kg_dobson: The Greenland paper is one of my favourite papers explaining how to correctly interpret p values, confidence intervals, and…
ASA声明の"they may more directly address the size of an effect (and its associated uncertainty) or whether the hypothesis is correct."の「仮説が正しいかどうか」はどういう意味…？ >> The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose https://t.co/zRxsn6l1VD
RT @MaartenvSmeden: A good time to share again two good resources on p values https://t.co/C5QjAKeVa8 https://t.co/FZ6dGefB1l
RT @MaartenvSmeden: A good time to share again two good resources on p values https://t.co/C5QjAKeVa8 https://t.co/FZ6dGefB1l
RT @MaartenvSmeden: A good time to share again two good resources on p values https://t.co/C5QjAKeVa8 https://t.co/FZ6dGefB1l
RT @andres_fandino: Aquí hay dos excelentes referencias para revisar, sobre el tema de los valores p y su adecuada interpretación @SaludPub…
RT @MaartenvSmeden: A good time to share again two good resources on p values https://t.co/C5QjAKeVa8 https://t.co/FZ6dGefB1l
RT @andres_fandino: Aquí hay dos excelentes referencias para revisar, sobre el tema de los valores p y su adecuada interpretación @SaludPub…
Aquí hay dos excelentes referencias para revisar, sobre el tema de los valores p y su adecuada interpretación @SaludPublicaUV @Univalle_FSalud
RT @MaartenvSmeden: A good time to share again two good resources on p values https://t.co/C5QjAKeVa8 https://t.co/FZ6dGefB1l
RT @MaartenvSmeden: A good time to share again two good resources on p values https://t.co/C5QjAKeVa8 https://t.co/FZ6dGefB1l
RT @MaartenvSmeden: A good time to share again two good resources on p values https://t.co/C5QjAKeVa8 https://t.co/FZ6dGefB1l
RT @MaartenvSmeden: A good time to share again two good resources on p values https://t.co/C5QjAKeVa8 https://t.co/FZ6dGefB1l
RT @MaartenvSmeden: A good time to share again two good resources on p values https://t.co/C5QjAKeVa8 https://t.co/FZ6dGefB1l
RT @MaartenvSmeden: A good time to share again two good resources on p values https://t.co/C5QjAKeVa8 https://t.co/FZ6dGefB1l
RT @MaartenvSmeden: A good time to share again two good resources on p values https://t.co/C5QjAKeVa8 https://t.co/FZ6dGefB1l
RT @MaartenvSmeden: A good time to share again two good resources on p values https://t.co/C5QjAKeVa8 https://t.co/FZ6dGefB1l
A good time to share again two good resources on p values https://t.co/C5QjAKeVa8 https://t.co/FZ6dGefB1l
自分で調べても力不足ではっきりしなかったことを尋ねてみたら生物統計の専門家の方が答えて下さった😭 参考文献もあるから自分でも確認できて更に勉強できる。 なんて素晴らしい日でしょう♪
@izumin_ST 私はあまり意識したことがないので，ちょっと調べた範囲ですが... アメリカ統計協会から出せれたP値の声明を見てみました． 原文はp(斜体)-valueでした． https://t.co/5xjVZNEGKe 一方，計量生物学会から出されている邦訳はP値で斜体ではなかったです． https://t.co/kmpCwK9Tbn
RT @coalfacer: Q: Why do colleges & grad schools teach p = 0.05? A: it's what editors & the scientific community use. Q: Why do editors &…
RT @coalfacer: Q: Why do colleges & grad schools teach p = 0.05? A: it's what editors & the scientific community use. Q: Why do editors &…
Q: Why do colleges & grad schools teach p = 0.05? A: it's what editors & the scientific community use. Q: Why do editors & the scientific community use p = 0.05? A: it's what they were taught in school. https://t.co/u9GjsIXhte
RT @chadinabhan: Every so often, remembering that not everything is about the P value is important. Looking at the entire data, the clinica…
Every so often, remembering that not everything is about the P value is important. Looking at the entire data, the clinical context, the information, and impact on clinical care are all essential. Clinical significance is critical. https://t.co/aZ09lZNmxB
@tunguz @marco_lainez_ @AllenDowney The ASA say you don't https://t.co/jw4ncYlqcU
@sherajilir I don't like volcano plots, because they put far too much emphasis on the magnitude of p-values; see point 5 of the ASA statement: https://t.co/LAwQmJa93R
Interesting stuff to read and digestible for the non-statistician, as I am: https://t.co/HaxDuFlTy1 https://t.co/mbiKpMailI https://t.co/Xrb31ILlBM https://t.co/mRryCYakbI
RT @AliOilhan: @SinanAlper_ Evet p value isini dogru bilen doktoralilar arasinda bile cok az insan var, American Statistical Association ac…
@SinanAlper_ Evet p value isini dogru bilen doktoralilar arasinda bile cok az insan var, American Statistical Association aciklama yapmak zorunda kaldi, okumamis olanlar icin birakayim suraya: https://t.co/msINpzzCvJ
@raissadeboer I really like the statement on P-values from the American Stat. Ass. Very clear and easy to follow. https://t.co/luKJtKwPqr
@matthewherper @CMichaelGibson I was looking for something about the decision theoretic use of p-values ( my 45 y/o memories were about the use of loss functions for type I and II errors) but I ran across this from ASA in 2016: https://t.co/PVq74ZeV9W
Budding Scholars must read this "The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose" https://t.co/9NDauashis #research #scholars #phdlife
What do you think of this? "Scientific conclusions and business or policy decisions should not be based only on whether a p-value passes a specific threshold." https://t.co/bSCxHU1tyT #sciencetwitter
Statical Significance quoted without an effect size means nothing. A significant difference in the depent variables alone will not demonstrate the effect of the independent variable Adds a level of doubt in my mind regarding the many of the papers that I
RT @biomechstu: ❓Why do so many colleges and grad schools teach p = 0.05? 🗣️ Because that's still what the scientific community and journa…
Aunque ya tenga tiempo, vale la pena recuperarlo: https://t.co/xBtQdQ50zH
❓Why do so many colleges and grad schools teach p = 0.05? 🗣️ Because that's still what the scientific community and journal editors use. ❓Why do so many people still use p = 0.05? 🗣️ Because that's what they were taught in college or grad school. https
@PeterKilmarx @Witmapanga If the gold standard is a meta‐analysis of randomized trials, then: 1) https://t.co/0e4coCdw5e - 56% 2) https://t.co/H20iATaZQZ - 54% Do you agree with the American Statistical Association position on the p-value? https://t.co/n
The ASA Statement on p-Values https://t.co/8LCHiYQVEZ
@PeterKilmarx What is the purpose of randomisation? Do you disagree with the American Statistical Association with respect to statistical significance? https://t.co/zGOLvudO3V
@PeterKilmarx I have no qualms about the trials being stopped early. I believe the evidence from female-to-male HIV trials. Why do you not believe the male-to-female HIV trial? Do you disagree with the American Statistical Association on statistical si
RT briandavidearp: RT GwinyaiMasukume: PeterKilmarx 3 RCTS on female-to-male HIV transmission were stopped early. Do you have any qualms about that? What do you say about increased HIV infection in circumcised compared to uncircumcised in that trial? St…
RT @GwinyaiMasukume: @PeterKilmarx 3 RCTS on female-to-male HIV transmission were stopped early. Do you have any qualms about that? What do…
@PeterKilmarx 3 RCTS on female-to-male HIV transmission were stopped early. Do you have any qualms about that? What do you say about increased HIV infection in circumcised compared to uncircumcised in that trial? Statistical significance: https://t.co/zGO
@OrACORe_BWH so here are some key references! ASA Statement on p-values: https://t.co/CAjmAXQ5gc
@docmmapris @Witmapanga @TheLancet The American Statistical Association Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose: “Scientific conclusions and business or policy decisions should not be based only on whether a p-value passes a specific threshold
As a reminder to my colleagues in Learning, Cognitive Sciences, and related fields: "Scientific conclusions and business or policy decisions should not be based only on whether a p-value passes a specific threshold." — The American Statistical Association
RT @nelson_lab: Absolutely, p-values are often misused and misinterpreted, in part because of ratings systems like this. Emojis highlight t…
@dkernohan hmm, the ASA say "P-values do not measure the probability that the studied hypothesis is true, or the probability that the data were produced by random chance alone." https://t.co/ekZn0GlwWZ
@rainerzufall_le That was the point :) The tweet seems to have taken forever to go online thoug.. https://t.co/SXerKKgkYp