↓ Skip to main content

Practice Advisory for Preanesthesia Evaluation

Overview of attention for article published in Anesthesiology, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
20 news outlets
twitter
5 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
567 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
280 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Practice Advisory for Preanesthesia Evaluation
Published in
Anesthesiology, March 2012
DOI 10.1097/aln.0b013e31823c1067
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeffrey L Apfelbaum, Richard T Connis, David G Nickinovich, L Reuven Pasternak, James F Arens, Robert A Caplan, Richard T Connis, Lee A Fleisher, Richard Flowerdew, Barbara S Gold, James F Mayhew, David G Nickinovich, Linda Jo Rice, Michael F Roizen, Rebecca S Twersky

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 280 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 271 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 39 14%
Student > Postgraduate 33 12%
Researcher 28 10%
Student > Bachelor 26 9%
Student > Master 19 7%
Other 59 21%
Unknown 76 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 151 54%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 1%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 1%
Other 11 4%
Unknown 92 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 169. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2024.
All research outputs
#261,150
of 26,813,756 outputs
Outputs from Anesthesiology
#59
of 6,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,054
of 170,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Anesthesiology
#1
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,813,756 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,920 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,810 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.