↓ Skip to main content

Update of the Brazilian floristic list of Algae and Cyanobacteria

Overview of attention for article published in Rodriguésia, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#7 of 240)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Update of the Brazilian floristic list of Algae and Cyanobacteria
Published in
Rodriguésia, January 2015
DOI 10.1590/2175-7860201566408
Authors

Mariângela Menezes, Carlos E. M. Bicudo, Carlos W. N. Moura, Aigara M. Alves, Alana A. Santos, Alexandre de G. Pedrini, Andréa Araújo, Andrea Tucci, Aurelio Fajar, Camila Malone, Cecília H. Kano, Célia L. Sant'Anna, Ciro Z. Branco, Clarisse Odebrecht, Cleto K. Peres, Emanuel B. Neuhaus, Enide Eskinazi-Leça, Eveline Aquino, Fabio Nauer, Gabriel N. Santos, Gilberto M. Amado Filho, Goia M. Lyra, Gyslaine C.P. Borges, Iara O. Costa, Ina de S. Nogueira, Ivania B. Oliveira, Joel. C.de Paula, José M. de C. Nunes, Jucicleide C. Lima, Kleber R.S. Santos, Leandro C. Ferreira, Lísia M.S. Gestinari, Luciana S. Cardoso, Marcia A.O. Figueiredo, Marcos H. Silva, Maria B.B.B. Barreto, Maria C.O. Henriques, Maria da G.G.S. Cunha, Maria E. Bandeira-Pedrosa, Maria F. Oliveira-Carvalho, Maria T.M. Széchy, Maria T.P. Azevedo, Mariana C. de Oliveira, Mariê M. Cabezudo, Marilene F. Santiago, Marli Bergesh, Mutuê T. Fujii, Norma C. Bueno, Orlando Necchi Jr., Priscila B. Jesus, Ricardo G. Bahia, Samir Khader, Sandra M. Alves-da-Silva, Silvia M.P.B. Guimarães, Sonia M.B. Pereira, Taiara A. Caires, Thamis Meurer, Valéria Cassano, Vera R. Werner, Watson A. da Gama Jr., Weliton J. da Silva

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Uruguay 1 1%
Unknown 83 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 19%
Researcher 12 14%
Professor 10 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 16 19%
Unknown 17 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 32%
Environmental Science 16 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Chemistry 5 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 4%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 22 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2016.
All research outputs
#3,795,065
of 22,856,968 outputs
Outputs from Rodriguésia
#7
of 240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,909
of 353,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Rodriguésia
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,856,968 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 240 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.