↓ Skip to main content

Update of the Brazilian floristic list of Algae and Cyanobacteria

Overview of attention for article published in Rodriguésia, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#11 of 279)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Update of the Brazilian floristic list of Algae and Cyanobacteria
Published in
Rodriguésia, January 2015
DOI 10.1590/2175-7860201566408
Authors

Mariângela Menezes, Carlos E. M. Bicudo, Carlos W. N. Moura, Aigara M. Alves, Alana A. Santos, Alexandre de G. Pedrini, Andréa Araújo, Andrea Tucci, Aurelio Fajar, Camila Malone, Cecília H. Kano, Célia L. Sant'Anna, Ciro Z. Branco, Clarisse Odebrecht, Cleto K. Peres, Emanuel B. Neuhaus, Enide Eskinazi-Leça, Eveline Aquino, Fabio Nauer, Gabriel N. Santos, Gilberto M. Amado, Goia M. Lyra, Gyslaine C.P. Borges, Iara O. Costa, Ina de S. Nogueira, Ivania B. Oliveira, Joel. C.de Paula, José M. de C. Nunes, Jucicleide C. Lima, Kleber R.S. Santos, Leandro C. Ferreira, Lísia M.S. Gestinari, Luciana S. Cardoso, Marcia A.O. Figueiredo, Marcos H. Silva, Maria B.B.B. Barreto, Maria C.O. Henriques, Maria da G.G.S. Cunha, Maria E. Bandeira-Pedrosa, Maria F. Oliveira-Carvalho, Maria T.M. Széchy, Maria T.P. Azevedo, Mariana C. de Oliveira, Mariê M. Cabezudo, Marilene F. Santiago, Marli Bergesh, Mutuê T. Fujii, Norma C. Bueno, Orlando Necchi, Priscila B. Jesus, Ricardo G. Bahia, Samir Khader, Sandra M. Alves-da-Silva, Silvia M.P.B. Guimarães, Sonia M.B. Pereira, Taiara A. Caires, Thamis Meurer, Valéria Cassano, Vera R. Werner, Watson A. da Gama, Weliton J. da Silva

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Uruguay 1 1%
Unknown 90 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 15%
Researcher 13 14%
Professor 11 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Other 17 19%
Unknown 20 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 32%
Environmental Science 17 19%
Chemistry 6 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 3%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 26 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2016.
All research outputs
#4,369,982
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Rodriguésia
#11
of 279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,672
of 359,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Rodriguésia
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 279 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,538 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.