You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Proceedings of the Third Annual Deep Brain Stimulation Think Tank: A Review of Emerging Issues and Technologies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2016.00119 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
P. Justin Rossi, Aysegul Gunduz, Jack Judy, Linda Wilson, Andre Machado, James J. Giordano, W. Jeff Elias, Marvin A. Rossi, Christopher L. Butson, Michael D. Fox, Cameron C. McIntyre, Nader Pouratian, Nicole C. Swann, Coralie de Hemptinne, Robert E. Gross, Howard J. Chizeck, Michele Tagliati, Andres M. Lozano, Wayne Goodman, Jean-Philippe Langevin, Ron L. Alterman, Umer Akbar, Greg A. Gerhardt, Warren M. Grill, Mark Hallett, Todd Herrington, Jeffrey Herron, Craig van Horne, Brian H. Kopell, Anthony E. Lang, Codrin Lungu, Daniel Martinez-Ramirez, Alon Y. Mogilner, Rene Molina, Enrico Opri, Kevin J. Otto, Karim G. Oweiss, Yagna Pathak, Aparna Shukla, Jonathan Shute, Sameer A. Sheth, Ludy C. Shih, G. Karl Steinke, Alexander I. Tröster, Nora Vanegas, Kareem A. Zaghloul, Leopoldo Cendejas-Zaragoza, Leonard Verhagen, Kelly D. Foote, Michael S. Okun |
| Abstract |
The proceedings of the 3rd Annual Deep Brain Stimulation Think Tank summarize the most contemporary clinical, electrophysiological, imaging, and computational work on DBS for the treatment of neurological and neuropsychiatric disease. Significant innovations of the past year are emphasized. The Think Tank's contributors represent a unique multidisciplinary ensemble of expert neurologists, neurosurgeons, neuropsychologists, psychiatrists, scientists, engineers, and members of industry. Presentations and discussions covered a broad range of topics, including policy and advocacy considerations for the future of DBS, connectomic approaches to DBS targeting, developments in electrophysiology and related strides toward responsive DBS systems, and recent developments in sensor and device technologies. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 2 | 40% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 187 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 40 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 16% |
| Professor | 18 | 9% |
| Other | 16 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 8% |
| Other | 43 | 22% |
| Unknown | 30 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 22% |
| Engineering | 39 | 20% |
| Neuroscience | 35 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 4% |
| Psychology | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 23 | 12% |
| Unknown | 40 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2016.
All research outputs
#7,460,122
of 25,810,956 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#4,827
of 11,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,669
of 316,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#68
of 174 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,810,956 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,715 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,714 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 174 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.