↓ Skip to main content

Population-level impact and herd effects following the introduction of human papillomavirus vaccination programmes: updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#46 of 33,340)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
168 Mendeley
Title
Population-level impact and herd effects following the introduction of human papillomavirus vaccination programmes: updated systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
The Lancet, August 2019
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(19)30298-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mélanie Drolet, Élodie Bénard, Norma Pérez, Marc Brisson, Hammad Ali, Marie-Claude Boily, Vincenzo Baldo, Paul Brassard, Julia M L Brotherton, Denton Callander, Marta Checchi, Eric P F Chow, Silvia Cocchio, Tina Dalianis, Shelley L Deeks, Christian Dehlendorff, Basil Donovan, Christopher K Fairley, Elaine W Flagg, Julia W Gargano, Suzanne M Garland, Nathalie Grün, Bo T Hansen, Christopher Harrison, Eva Herweijer, Teresa M Imburgia, Anne M Johnson, Jessica A Kahn, Kimberley Kavanagh, Susanne K Kjaer, Erich V Kliewer, Bette Liu, Dorothy A Machalek, Lauri Markowitz, David Mesher, Christian Munk, Linda Niccolai, Mari Nygård, Gina Ogilvie, Jeannie Oliphant, Kevin G Pollock, Maria Jesús Purriños-Hermida, Megan A Smith, Marc Steben, Anna Söderlund-Strand, Pam Sonnenberg, Pär Sparen, Clare Tanton, Cosette M Wheeler, Petra J Woestenberg, Bo Nancy Yu

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3,285 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 168 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 23%
Researcher 20 12%
Other 15 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 8%
Student > Postgraduate 9 5%
Other 37 22%
Unknown 35 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Unspecified 6 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Other 31 18%
Unknown 48 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2430. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2020.
All research outputs
#671
of 14,575,437 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#46
of 33,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26
of 258,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#2
of 452 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,575,437 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,340 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,847 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 452 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.