@Faktantarkast10 This may be a temporary effect, as the accumulation over East Antarctica increases due to a warmer ocean. https://t.co/0fJoFJvqd6
global mean sea level has been 6–9 metres higher as recently as the Last Interglacial (130,000 to 115,000 years ago) and possibly higher during the Pliocene epoch (about three million years ago). https://t.co/u85yuV8AaL
Within 20 or 50 years instead of several hundred years, the ice bed will be collapsed, according to this survey. https://t.co/HUtrMWBUGj
@unclebobmartin @guynullval The predictions of overall higher temperatures, Antartic ice loss, sea level rise. Many of these predictions are discussed in peer-reviewed journals, just to cite a few: https://t.co/MgHjSSZMoS
RT @lucasbergkamp: @wouterkeller Contribution of Antarctica to past and future sea-level rise, Robert M. DeConto & David Pollard in Nature:…
@wouterkeller Contribution of Antarctica to past and future sea-level rise, Robert M. DeConto & David Pollard in Nature: https://t.co/T1q4cFilM9 — Heeft de rechter dit artikel wel goed begrepen?
RT @lucasbergkamp: @fvdr @ClintelNED Dat lijkt er wel op, de rechter leest zelfs artikelen uit Nature, als het uitkomt: "In the more extrem…
RT @lucasbergkamp: "Antarctica has the potential to contribute more than a metre of sea-level rise by 2100 and more than 15 metres by 2500,…
RT @lucasbergkamp: "Antarctica has the potential to contribute more than a metre of sea-level rise by 2100 and more than 15 metres by 2500,…
RT @lucasbergkamp: "Antarctica has the potential to contribute more than a metre of sea-level rise by 2100 and more than 15 metres by 2500,…
RT @lucasbergkamp: "Antarctica has the potential to contribute more than a metre of sea-level rise by 2100 and more than 15 metres by 2500,…
@fvdr @ClintelNED Dat lijkt er wel op, de rechter leest zelfs artikelen uit Nature, als het uitkomt: "In the more extreme scenario (DeConto & Pollard), which predicts a total sea level rise of approximately 1.7m in 2100, the Wadden Sea will drown befor
RT @lucasbergkamp: "Antarctica has the potential to contribute more than a metre of sea-level rise by 2100 and more than 15 metres by 2500,…
"Antarctica has the potential to contribute more than a metre of sea-level rise by 2100 and more than 15 metres by 2500, if emissions continue unabated." -- What is this kind of science called? https://t.co/rDcfbqhqfy
최후심판의 빙하가 녹는 과정을 모델링해서 평균해수면 변화를 시뮬레이션으로 예측한 2016년 네이쳐지 논문: DeConto, R. M., & Pollard, D. (2016). Contribution of Antarctica to past and future sea-level rise. Nature, 531(7596), 591–597. https://t.co/Lh6vVj1RFD https://t.co/KLIszVnXqG
@too_sham Il ne s'agit que de la reprise de projections déjà publiées, notamment via https://t.co/7cPzL7QBNS et https://t.co/KnA1KeLc8C.
@RolfSchuttenh @daanboezeman @HeleendeConinck @NUnl @geografieNL @vrij_nederland Eigenlijk staan we al echt op scherp sinds dit artikel in Nature (https://t.co/LYVKfiHqAd). Toen werd echt duidelijk dat het wel eens fors kon tegenvallen.
@Eli89637688 @mcjulesface @abcnews Rich nations may be able to do this for a few decades but we are currently looking at 1300 mm in 80 years time. This wipes out countries not just back yards. :-( How high do you build to be 'safe'‽ https://t.co/uibpZ6fVr
The addition of modern and improved paleo-constraints and other model improvements leads to a median projection for 2100 SLR that is less than half the previous projection from this team (13/n) https://t.co/Lsd0XDYDPo
These studies are: https://t.co/cyV2Fm2fvj https://t.co/ONPCITpMq6 11/11
@reportfromNL Op lange termijn (het woord 'lange' is er door de redactie uitgeknipt. Kijk bijvoorbeeld even naar dit Nature(!) paper: op 440 ppm en 2 graden opwarming (waarschijnlijk nog een onderschatting), is er 17 m zeespiegelstijging van Antarctica te
@reportfromNL @WattisDuurzaam @hansvancleef @peterpolder @Lijnonline @deltares "aanleiding nieuwe studie van De Conto en Pollard('16)in Nature" https://t.co/C2iwwKCRtt "geeft aan dat 2 meter zeespiegelstijging mogelijk al in 2100 bereikt wordt, en 21 mete
@twilamoon @ArchaeoHacker @ClimateCentral Apart from specific local examples (e.g. NYC or Miami), @IceDoctorD recently suggested using DeConto and Pollard (https://t.co/TXEWDme5xp) to explore sea level rise by 2100 versus 2500 --> and what that means fo
@Tessa_M_Hill I guess they aren’t that recent, but I’m partial to papers that go beyond 2100 projections and connect future dynamics and equilibrium to what we’ve seen in the deep past. Golledge et al, 2015 https://t.co/6hIVA3fFpX DeConto and Pollard, 2
@Capobianco2005C @Nicola_Bressi 2) - Contribution of Antarctica to past and future sea-level rise https://t.co/OT9BrmMYxf 3) Accelerated modern human–induced species losses: Entering the sixth mass extinction https://t.co/0Xe0Vntymk
While we have commitment issue with climate solutions, we are in a committed long-term relationship with #SeaLevelRise. We're talking meters folks, not centimeters. Excerpt from paper titled "Contribution of Antarctica to past and future sea-level rise."
@MWClimateSci but mostly the talk is about understanding the controversy and subsequent ideas about the most-cited paleo nature paper by DeConto and Pollard https://t.co/9IWBBN3DwR
RT @rdlarter: Such high resolution is of critical importance for validating ice sheet models that show major ice loss can occur within a fe…
RT @rdlarter: Such high resolution is of critical importance for validating ice sheet models that show major ice loss can occur within a fe…
Antartida 2019 _ Alguna perdida imortante de hielos puede ocurrir en algunos ( cientos de años ) . Tendremos que estar atentos que ocurre en los proximos 10 años , hasta 2030 en principio. Info de Cientifico Robert Larter.
Such high resolution is of critical importance for validating ice sheet models that show major ice loss can occur within a few thousand (or even a few hundred) years. For example https://t.co/WLtsaOGLyP 7/10 https://t.co/RHt4LLR1fR
.@wolfgangcramer is concerned about us having consistently underestimated risk of Antarctic deglaciation https://t.co/XCRJ5GCYyX #EEFLisbon2019
@frotograf To https://t.co/xPdhBhCi0j i symulowanie tutaj: https://t.co/N4ixbsKTQp Info o ile do kiedy wzrośnie jest mocno rozproszone. Generalnie wiesz fake-news-alert mode on.
@SaulSchubak @satuhassi Rajaat maalitolpat valitsemalla itse uskottavuuden ja relevantin tulevaisuuden, mutta onhan näitä artikkeleita ollut esim. Sciencessä (IF ~37): https://t.co/3cjkvu4eTN, https://t.co/JBbLhQLA1i ja Naturessa (IF ~42): https://t.co/FJB
RT @mammuthus: @keithalexander This paper is pretty much the worst case scenario (and unlikely). East Antarctica has 60m of sea level in it…
@keithalexander This paper is pretty much the worst case scenario (and unlikely). East Antarctica has 60m of sea level in it and literally no one is saying 30m in the next 100 to 200 years https://t.co/ixTNGwR6dZ
Contribution of Antarctica to past and future sea-level rise | Nature https://t.co/E4l1GJeNTF
RT @MWClimateSci: The paper follows on from DeConto and Pollard 2016 https://t.co/Ggxo18Xd8l, which raised the prospect of rapid and catast…
The paper follows on from DeConto and Pollard 2016 https://t.co/Ggxo18Xd8l, which raised the prospect of rapid and catastrophic ice loss from Antarctica in the startlingly near term.
@GlacierBytes @AGrinsted @snapplanetio Idea from de Conto + Pollard 2016 https://t.co/4agc89BecQ #MICI assumes v high rates of melt + hydrofracture (meltwater drains into crevasses extending them) initiating fast calving retreat + rapid #SeaLevelRise (#sat
@brjma Hahahaha, I did in our previous discussion. Your unsubstaniated opinion was that the evidence provided was faked. Check out @mlpinkerton’s Tweet: https://t.co/H6r2bgYKtX
@brjma @DoctorKarl Some References below but there are literally thousands out there: https://t.co/hoAdrmDik5 https://t.co/JGKqUJlfVW https://t.co/G8d3xAXduz
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of Sea Level Rise by the end of this century. That's double what IPCC said just 5 years ago. Our understanding of the rate of collapse it
@MichaelEMann Yes, but even here the rate of sea level rise depends strongly (and I'd say almost linearly) on the forcing. So, even if we pass a threshold the West Antarctic Ice Sheet won't just drop in the ocean. It'll take many hundreds or even thousands
DeConto and Pollard suggested SURFACE melt on Antarctic ice-shelves could lead to their break-up which would greatly speed ice-flow into the oceans and much greater sea-level rise https://t.co/DxdGlQVW9z. solar geo would be effective at offsetting this sur
“Antarctica has the potential to contribute more than a metre of sea-level rise by 2100 and more than 15 metres by 2500, if emissions continue unabated...” https://t.co/AsBlgTNK0q #ChineseHoax #ClimateChange #climate
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
RT @MichaelEMann: Projections out to 2100 are now doubled relative to AR5 (2+ meters instead of 1, ie 6-8 feet rather than 3), largely beca…
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
@tan123 "Sea level rise of up to 2m may displace almost 2.5% of the global population" (Rohling et al. 2013). https://t.co/Lw3FQNuVVD
RT @Cedders68: @icarus62 I would hope not as fast as exponential, or if so doubling time not Hansen's worst case: https://t.co/WX9hTo0V8T…
RT @MichaelEMann: Projections out to 2100 are now doubled relative to AR5 (2+ meters instead of 1, ie 6-8 feet rather than 3), largely beca…
RT @MichaelEMann: Projections out to 2100 are now doubled relative to AR5 (2+ meters instead of 1, ie 6-8 feet rather than 3), largely beca…