RT @Pseudo_Isidore: "no evidence for preindustrial globally coherent cold and warm epochs" https://t.co/CrpC6QvMeq (via @Byzanzforscher) #C…
RT @Pseudo_Isidore: "no evidence for preindustrial globally coherent cold and warm epochs" https://t.co/CrpC6QvMeq (via @Byzanzforscher) #C…
RT @Pseudo_Isidore: "no evidence for preindustrial globally coherent cold and warm epochs" https://t.co/CrpC6QvMeq (via @Byzanzforscher) #C…
RT @Pseudo_Isidore: "no evidence for preindustrial globally coherent cold and warm epochs" https://t.co/CrpC6QvMeq (via @Byzanzforscher) #C…
RT @Pseudo_Isidore: "no evidence for preindustrial globally coherent cold and warm epochs" https://t.co/CrpC6QvMeq (via @Byzanzforscher) #C…
RT @Byzanzforscher: Warum der derzeitige #Klimawandel außergewöhnlich ist - die wichtigsten Erkenntnisse der Studie von Neukom et al. (http…
RT @Pseudo_Isidore: "no evidence for preindustrial globally coherent cold and warm epochs" https://t.co/CrpC6QvMeq (via @Byzanzforscher) #C…
"no evidence for preindustrial globally coherent cold and warm epochs" https://t.co/CrpC6QvMeq (via @Byzanzforscher) #ClimateChange
RT @Byzanzforscher: Warum der derzeitige #Klimawandel außergewöhnlich ist - die wichtigsten Erkenntnisse der Studie von Neukom et al. (http…
RT @Byzanzforscher: Warum der derzeitige #Klimawandel außergewöhnlich ist - die wichtigsten Erkenntnisse der Studie von Neukom et al. (http…
Warum der derzeitige #Klimawandel außergewöhnlich ist - die wichtigsten Erkenntnisse der Studie von Neukom et al. (https://t.co/TLynkHCmOy) nochmals auf Deutsch zusammengefasst im aktuellen "Spektrum der Wissenschaft" https://t.co/xfm0SJ9Ehv
@RoastAnatomy @GretaThunberg No you're not. LIA was a local event that drifted around. You're not up to speed, spreading nonsense is all. https://t.co/qwfo3lWSSV
@NeasdenParade @thinks_about_it @HalleVerkehrt @GretaThunberg What are you talking about???? 50-50???? Read some science for Christ's sake! MWP was NOT global. https://t.co/rmRX3SuklY
@WJvanDinter @kurtyykins @hertsgaard_mark @BruceMcTavish @SoutarMike @sophiamathur @GretaThunberg Do your homework, please. https://t.co/qwfo3lWSSV
@rafdbarat @ClarkeMicah @BarumDean And another global study published last year. https://t.co/F4v4F04fea https://t.co/1csQmZGwJt
@Nemhthenga @sixmax @EcoSenseNow The medieval warm period refers to the warm period experienced by England, and the surrounding region. It is not indicative of a global warm period. https://t.co/YfI3AAMMk2
RT @SimonLeeWx: @ChrisMartzWX @NoTricksZone I don't know the dataset you are using, but it would not look the same if you used these recons…
RT @SimonLeeWx: @ChrisMartzWX @NoTricksZone I don't know the dataset you are using, but it would not look the same if you used these recons…
RT @SimonLeeWx: @ChrisMartzWX @NoTricksZone I don't know the dataset you are using, but it would not look the same if you used these recons…
@SpurglyDurglish @manifesto2000 @826Maureen @GretaThunberg @XRebellionAus @KIVUNature @DrUmeshPrabhu @JuliePi31415926 Could you tell me, please, how this represents an argument to the paradigm of AGW? As we know from science, local events have nothing to d
@ChrisMartzWX @NoTricksZone I don't know the dataset you are using, but it would not look the same if you used these reconstructions (Fig. 1a in https://t.co/Qi7Fuf5mZc) including one by @MichaelEMann. As you can see, everything after the mid-20th C is unp
@mus_nico @SiemenvdWier Nee natuurlijk niet. Ziljoen proxies. Vooral veel schelpen, boorkernen, isotopen, stuifmeel, boomringen, scheepsjournaals, planktonafzettingen. https://t.co/kQplKhUg50
@amazinglife03 @thiskidsthinkin @clumsy_moose @Pliny_theElder @Fincey47 @RyanMaue Scientists, studies say climate is warming much faster than past. NASA: "evidence reveals that current warming is occurring roughly ten times faster than the average rate of
@rerayro @NewsHour @tan123 Uhm. No. There are scientific techniques to measure the climate then. https://t.co/l5rZbsywv8. https://t.co/zpCqnY57gz
@funnysideup13 @Cl1mateF1ghter @hb348 @CNN https://t.co/a52ZPdE9Yv Even the LIA wasn't totally global, it just effected enough of the earth to show a trend.
RT @quieroserabuela: @MagChange_73 @YvanDutil @annedeblois @morininfo L'article auquel vous faites référence n'adresse pas le rechauffement…
@MagChange_73 @YvanDutil @annedeblois @morininfo L'article auquel vous faites référence n'adresse pas le rechauffement actuel ("last glacial maximum") et décrit un phénomene local (le Groenland), pas global, comme l'est l'actuel. Il n'est donc pas pertinen
@Massenhypnose @TecCreator @tagesschau Auch wenn Sie nicht lesen können : https://t.co/WeKqjUzQP7 Viel Spaß.
@everclay1 @notaYIMBY btw: they don't like the world "coherent". They think it's a secret science term deliberately designed to obfuscate! Eg., they really don't like this: https://t.co/qwfo3lWSSV
@bobsticle1 @tan123 Globally it in all likelihood wasn't. Today's warming affects 98% of the earth's surface. That's not what the evidence shows for the medieval warm period. https://t.co/hJKcv3s1TV
@neil_ndbress @scotpolitik @Peters_Glen @richardabetts @TransitionShow There are two key differences between the little ice age and now: 1) it was likely local, yet today the temperature change affects 98% of the planet's surface. See https://t.co/hJKcv3s1
@bobsticle1 @tan123 No it hasn't. Atmospheric CO2 concentration has been stable for about 800,000 years. It never went above 300 PPM. And globally the 20th century has been the warmest in the last 2000 years https://t.co/hJKcv3s1TV https://t.co/bYlGvZhVx5
@excalib13388782 @Carbongate @M_dianagrace @JWSpry @FriendsOScience MWP, LIA, RWP have been determined to have not been consistent world wide. They were local events. Sorry. https://t.co/qwfo3lWSSV
@bobsticle1 @tan123 And so? That's the well-known medieval warm period, however it was local and entirely natural https://t.co/hJKcv3s1TV Today we see 98% of the planet's surface warming even though solar output is stagnant. How do you explain that? https:
@frthalk @KochIndustries @Flint_Hills_ @EnvDefenseFund @JimInhofe @Tony__Heller "The warmest period of the past 2000 yrs occurred during the twentieth century for more than 98% of the glove...global warming is not only unparalleled in terms of abs temps, b
@wadesworld2112 @curryja @MichaelEMann @KHayhoe @GeraldKutney Globally coherent means consistent and logical throughout the globe. Exactly what it says. https://t.co/qwfo3lWSSV
@red_x__ @quieroserabuela @bjames280961 @curryja @MichaelEMann @KHayhoe @GeraldKutney Leo - that event was not globally coherent. It was a local event, just like LIA, MWP, RWP, etc. https://t.co/qwfo3lWSSV
@ClimateRealists @Perinucleolus Global study published last year in Nature based on 698 proxies from 642 locations. Notice that the Roman period and MWP were not global and were not warmer than current global average temperature https://t.co/F4v4F04fea ht
@Never_Sur_ender @ClimateSkeptic4 @JNilsso26015893 @Nes2r3 @Michael63746953 @Tayelrand @tan123 @GretaThunberg The MWP, LIA, RWP, etc were not globally coherent events. They were local & circumscribed, and LIA even moved around. It's good to stay curren
@ClimateSkeptic4 Your profile header is out of date and misleading, big time! https://t.co/qwfo3lWSSV
@lapogus1 @Greenpeace @DoctorsXr @ScientistsX You could also ask @daniel_steiner about the Little Ice Age, he co-authored this recent paper https://t.co/eNO6pEOwwX or ask @njsteiger about global warming and cooling before the industrial revolution https://
RT @EarthAnimalHeal: 今日読んだ論文 ①温暖化と寒冷化はこれまでの地球において何度も繰り返し起こっていて ②現在の温暖化はそういった自然現象だから気にするな という意見を否定するものです つまり①は正しいが②は正しくない 現在の温暖化は自然現象と呼ぶに…
今日読んだ論文 ①温暖化と寒冷化はこれまでの地球において何度も繰り返し起こっていて ②現在の温暖化はそういった自然現象だから気にするな という意見を否定するものです つまり①は正しいが②は正しくない 現在の温暖化は自然現象と呼ぶには不自然過ぎる、とのこと https://t.co/vmWO8RJgdt
@Electroversenet @HOTDOG429 Actually there is. The current warming affects 98% of the earth' surface. And that's incidentally the big difference to e.g. the little ice age or the medieval warm period which were local. https://t.co/hJKcv3s1TV
@GarethIsaacs @JosephsEddy @Steve85647298 @Cunningham_UK @uk_sf_writer @Dublinnewsguy @BBCNews @CarolineLucas Been there, done that... https://t.co/qwfo3lWSSV
RT @Ceist8: @DanCady @bigyin74 @BBCNews @bbc5live @itvnews @Channel4News @ProfBrianCox And another published in Nature last year: Showing t…
@DanCady @bigyin74 @BBCNews @bbc5live @itvnews @Channel4News @ProfBrianCox And another published in Nature last year: Showing the MWP and Roman warm period were not global and not warmer than current global temperatures. Again, based on hundreds of proxies
@andrw100 @ProfTimNoakes @halbard101 @GeraldKutney I’m not saying there’s no evidence, but it’s pretty thin. This is the most recent investigation. https://t.co/Uy2XmUgxqo)
@bigyin74 @BBCNews @bbc5live @itvnews @Channel4News @ProfBrianCox @GretaThunberg Except that LIA, MWP, RMP did not happen on a global scale. They were local events. Sorry to have to tell you that. Here's the past 2000 yrs... https://t.co/qwfo3lWSSV
@SmartMusclesMD @DanMaxey6 @jrltexas1 @RossYandle @tan123 You are comparing apples and oranges here. The medieval warm period in all likelihood was local https://t.co/hJKcv3s1TV Sure, with the current warming, Greenland may profit, but Africa, South Asia,
@cgale_825 @RossYandle @tan123 I guess you are hinting at the Medieval warm period. For all we know, it wasn't global. https://t.co/hJKcv3s1TV
@VoteoutTrudeau @robhon_ @formgestaltung @Waspotty5 @Eren84583727 Please drop LIA, MWP, RWP from your vocabulary. https://t.co/qwfo3lWSSV
@DL4GO @AKress84 @WerteUnion_BY Ich bezweifel, dass Sie in der Lage sind, die aktuelle Studienlage zur Thematik zu erfassen, aber hier ein aktueller Beweis in der Sache: https://t.co/WeKqjUzQP7 Versuchen Sie zumindest, es zu verstehen.
@RickGiEv Rick, Tim runs a website that's a clearing house of links to denial information. He's vindictive, besides not understanding science. If you care to respond to his Q about MWP & LIA, here's a good source. https://t.co/qwfo3lWSSV
@MPuciala Możliwe, że stan wiedzy się zmienił od tego czasu, podobnie zresztą jak temperatura. Obczaj to: https://t.co/nM90dLMYYn
@MPuciala @Neuropa_ Zdaje się, że źródłem może być ten artykuł: https://t.co/nM90dLMYYn
@SteveBrownBC It doesn't look like the medieval warm period was warmer. https://t.co/hJKcv3s1TV Do you have reports of Arctic ice disappearing 13 % / decade in the 1920/30s?
@colinhewetson1 @NamugerwaLeah @Fridays4future @350 @GretaThunberg @Greenpeace @ExtinctionR @UNICEFUganda You're not current w/ the science at all, Colin. As you guys like to say, "Go back to school." https://t.co/qwfo3lWSSV
@davepyper68 @ChiaroxOscuro @JeffTurdman @ajplus @GretaThunberg Here's 2k yrs... https://t.co/qwfo3lWSSV
@JeffArmitage1 @Dcoronata @PierreTherrie14 @UreyZen @ddbetty @TTyrannosaur @smithchickpea1 Look what I found, Jeff! Seems to show your LIA, RWM, and MWP, etc, were misinterpretations of localized events. Hmmm. https://t.co/qwfo3lWSSV
@tan123 @JuliusGoat Here Mr "oh I am so scientific but I am still a denier" I expect a full statistical and scientific analysis of the study, the data it uses. link is below 👇 I will wait. https://t.co/c6u2Z2GssG
@SimonMaxfield8 @jonsaxon67 @JasonSamfield @AlbertStienstra @tan123 @TIME @GretaThunberg That's what I thought, and it shows a pretty uneven regional distribution. No global warming like today. Corroborates https://t.co/hJKcv3s1TV
@SimonMaxfield8 @jonsaxon67 @JasonSamfield @AlbertStienstra @tan123 @TIME @GretaThunberg No, since the MWP wasn't global https://t.co/hJKcv3s1TV
@SimonMaxfield8 @jonsaxon67 @JasonSamfield @AlbertStienstra @tan123 @TIME @GretaThunberg How is this relevant? This is the well know Arctic warm period which was local https://t.co/hJKcv3s1TV