@philhuwedwards @JohnMashey @RARohde @john_p_rafferty So some regions were colder, some regions warmer... As it happens since _regional_ climate tends to show more variability than the global average. Distinguishing feature of the CURRENT man-made warming
@philhuwedwards @JohnMashey @RARohde @john_p_rafferty I don't think 'Wiki' is a scientific publication, isn't it? Those years are way to handwaving. The actual analysis is in the Neukom et al 2019 publication in Nature: https://t.co/jcnKaUFEbZ https://t.
@philhuwedwards @JohnMashey @RARohde @john_p_rafferty But those were not globally coherent warm (or cold), at the same time as Greenland. Please see Neukom 2019 about this: https://t.co/jcnKaUFEbZ
@ute_lias @PauliVahtera 1/2 Nykyisen lämpötilahistoriatutkimuksen mukaan mitään globaalia pientä jääkautta ei ole ollut olemassa, joten nyt menossa oleva lämpeneminen ei ole mitään "palautumista" siitä. Ja jos tosiaan uskot, että viikinkiaikana Grönlanniss
@Tigercuddles74 @GMB In the last 2000 years there has never been a planet-wide change in climate (including The Little Ice Age) but now there is. That and the speed of change is the difference. If you think this is wrong I look forward to reading your reb
@Markus2vara @JonneKorhonen1 @Demarit @MarinSanna Nykyisen lämpötilahistoriatutkimuksen mukaan mitään globaalia "mini jääkautta" ei ole ollut olemassa: https://t.co/gWVbDb1bmx https://t.co/k4VoJaXjSw
@KorlDa @Klimakatastroph Korl, nein. Warum? ⬇️ https://t.co/BH1LnIbuOr
@Ylikessu @KalleKaasujalka 2/2 ... pois. Nykyisen lämpötilahistoriatutkimuksen mukaan mitään globaalia pientä jääkautta ei ole ollut olemassa: https://t.co/gWVbDb1bmx https://t.co/IcrMBRmqFx
@RomanLasota @VolkerErb Und wieder weiter mit dem Wissenschaftsleugnen und den Strohmännern, weil Sie komplett ahnungslos und "quer" sind. Es gab die MWP, aber sie war nicht global (https://t.co/Sj1WDVPpHd). Sie haben den Unterschied zw. lokal und global n
@bargar_s24084 @DawnTJ90 @DrJamesEHansen @NASAGISS @NASAClimate GISTEMP only goes back to 1880, Berkeley Earth, NOAA and HadCRUT go back to 1850. They had several thousand weather stations globally back then and there was water temperature data taken by t
@PaulRobEsq @youpieceofsilva @RyanMaue Boy have I ever! That's why I know your screenshots are as worthless as you are. Now pay close attention- unlike uneducated and pathetic deniers, I show my sources. https://t.co/pYcQYftHgj https://t.co/BQRYuSGmhr
@JukkaH9 2/n ... ja kaikki uusin lämpötilahistoriatutkimus kertoo siitä, että mitään ns. pientä jääkautta ei globaalisti ole ollut olemassa. Paikallisia kylmiä kausia kyllä. Olet siis tässäkin asiassa uusimman tutkimuksen mukaan väärässä. https://t.co/gWVb
@jukka_keskitalo @RistoSantti Uusimman lämpötilahistoriatutkimuksen mukaan mitään globaalisti selvästi erottuvaa poikkeuksellisen kylmää pientä jääkautta ei ole ollut olemassa. https://t.co/E8c3zM36rr https://t.co/hqBgUw3TSW
@davidsmythe069 @DavidUllrich202 Again. Nature study not BS https://t.co/qLBQ7lkT37
@davidsmythe069 @Bazthebemused @DavidUllrich202 Already answered. Not globally warm everywhere at the save time. Too difficult a concept for you? Science deniers generally do not understand time https://t.co/qLBQ7lkT37
@davidsmythe069 @Bazthebemused @DavidUllrich202 I suggest you read. It wasn't globally warm everywhere at the same time. A very important concept https://t.co/qLBQ7lkT37
@latimeralder @walkermartyn @UN What experiments do you think climate scientists should be doing? Observations are at the core of climate science https://t.co/sd4aAqljlL https://t.co/gRwxL2NGpC
@JunkScience Single location data that ends long ago vs global average data https://t.co/sd4aAqljlL https://t.co/m5PhVhNSRI
@eskimosikyung @quasirob @CO2Coalition Factoring in the other hemisphere it works perfectly for my position. https://t.co/7WhPL5HZuy https://t.co/cT4t3WESVz https://t.co/xdD4yUsCko
@CO2Coalition Regional data that end long before the current day says nothing about global warming. This is global average data using multiple proxies https://t.co/sd4aAqljlL https://t.co/C0UlnJDTcX
@emilper @mihaiam @skdh Not everywhere all at the same time. I realize this is a difficult concept for you. https://t.co/qLBQ7llqSF
@emilper @skdh Not globally. Not globally all at the same time. Your ignorance is obvious https://t.co/qLBQ7lkT37
@roger_farmboy @ChrisPaboRhee @JunkScience You’re just being a silly troll
@emilper @skdh Why do you lie? https://t.co/qLBQ7lkT37
@Daaanvdb @CO2Coalition Global temperature reconstructions show the Roman period & MWP were NOT global & were not warmer than today. "No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era" -Neukom
@ChrisPaboRhee @JunkScience The Medieval and Roman periods were regional not global, and they were not warmer than today "No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era" -Neukom et al 2019 https://t.co/d776
@Resista05992670 @MrMatthewTodd The MWP was at best a regional event, affecting no more than 40% of the globe at any single point in time. Modern warming, in contrast, is globally coherent, affecting 98% of the planet, which is utterly unprecedented. As is
@JunkScience Looks like single location data from ice cores. This is global data from multiple proxy data sources https://t.co/sd4aAqljlL https://t.co/2Hxut92Ja8
@Tippling @StephanWeberHd @Regenbogenprin1 @SchneidGabriel @RobertoBelinzo2 @HolzheuStefan @MathiasPriebe Sind eh nur die ganzen dummen Lügen der Trolle. Fängt an mit Bild-Zeitung, einem Fake (https://t.co/zOK3CnxFhg), Unsinn mit Google Maps (LOL) von eine
@AriOkkonen @HuhtasaariSaara @OssiTiihonen Kuva IPCC AR6WG1. Mitään pientä jääkauttahan ei muuten globaalina, selvästi erottuvana yhtenäisenä kautena ole nykyisen paleoklimatologisen tutkimuksen perusteella edes ollut olemassa. Puheesi LIA:sta "toipumisest
@ray_vingnutter @MRobertsQLD Everything I said is true. Look it up. Earth wasn't warmer globally at all. Regional warming doesn't equal global warming. https://t.co/sd4aAqljlL https://t.co/BSXEz2azUj
@MatthewWielicki Several dozen replications of Mann’s work using a host of different proxies and methods. Wielicki is a deceptive junk scientist. #ClimateActionNow #ClimateBrawl https://t.co/L2YtTDRuH1
@Catoto_Fanboy @DrEliDavid @GretaThunberg Not globally warm or cooler everywhere at the same time. You have no argument layman https://t.co/qLBQ7lkT37
@TimRealityDE @_ClimateCraze @ClimateOfGavin To pronounce on the global extent of the MWP, the individual proxies on the map need to become part of a so-called proxy stack, which is sync'd in time & validated against modern temps, & used to synthes
@Petteri76 @hsfi Jos olisit vähän tutustunut uudempaan lämpötilahistoriatutkimukseen, tietäisit, että nykykäsityksen mukaan mitään globaalia pientä jääkautta ei ollut olemassa. Kannattaa perehtyä aiheisiin, joista xwiittailee. https://t.co/E8c3zM3EgZ http
@KUS96929318 @HMitterwald @cvictordus @HolzheuStefan Auch da ist die Antwort ganz einfach: Es war keine *globale* Erwärmung. Das wurde auch bereits hundert mal durchgekaut. https://t.co/G9GA4METbA https://t.co/bQVKmd7Uhg
@hugh_boner @Climate_Earth20 @Michael7215 That only proves it was warm in that region 2000 years ago. Proxy data shows the RWP wasn't global https://t.co/sd4aAqkLwd
@Luegendetektor @Willi1887H Hören Sie auf, so dreist zu lügen, Troll. https://t.co/vCiNmHfB9Z
@darrell_janzen @BryanLand111980 @desertveteran @JohnStossel @dawnegray3 @curryja That's data for one location in Greenland that ends long before today This is global data https://t.co/sd4aAqljlL https://t.co/Bn6xUK2VnQ
@GalvezDidier1 @AntipolisMy @AssoClimatoReal Aucune simultanéité dans les variations préindustrielles. https://t.co/ipZaRzjbp7
@c16h34 @hausfath No I don’t disagree there was a MWP period. The science shows it wasn’t global nor was it hotter than today which is what morons like you claim https://t.co/7WhPL5HrF0
@StephanWeberHd @PeterBa84734077 @vonDaeniken Was dabei rauskommt, wenn echte Wissenschaftler in echten Journals, die nicht von RWE geschmiert (s. https://t.co/Fe20I5YeJN) das untersuchen, steht hier: https://t.co/Sj1WDVORRF Aber weder Sie oder der andere
@AndreEriksenDK @rbclaus1 The Roman period warming of Europe and the North Atlantic is linked to intense solar activity, and was regional There are over 700 vineyards in the British Isles, and they are threatened by climate change. Some plantes thrive, o
@MartinZ_uncut L’optimum romain était selon toute vraisemblance local : https://t.co/xtYKrmViaK
@Marko65427716 @yleuutiset Et ilmeisesti ole yhtään seurannut lämpötilahistoriatutkimusta? Uusimman ko. tutkimuksen mitään globaalia pientä jääkautta ei ole ollut olemassa, joten kyse ei nyt siten ole siitä "palautumisesta": https://t.co/gWVbDb1bmx https:/
@BigJoeBastardi @JunkScience @NOAAClimate neither roman nor medieval optimums were warmer then today, and they weren't global phenomena https://t.co/PgDyylfl21
A pesar de lo que se cuenta a veces, esta nueva evidencia se suma a otras muchas en las que se obtiene que el periodo cálido romano no fue un proceso global como el actual ni, por supuesto, tan abrupto. https://t.co/StmGcLRnkZ
"En particular, encontramos que la época más fría del último milenio, la puta Edad de Hielo es más probable que haya experimentado las temperaturas más frías durante el siglo XV en el Océano Pacífico central y oriental" No soy yo, es el Google Translate
No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era No hay pruebas de periodos cálidos y fríos a escala mundial durante la era preindustrial. https://t.co/0jbldz4Yud
I riscaldamenti storici non furono globali, e soprattutto non avevano la coerenza temporale osservata oggi (fonte: https://t.co/EloNjc3eGN) https://t.co/5LChQRt8PH
@icebergerjager @kamantynen 1/2 Minkään modernin lämpötilahistoriatutkimuksen mukaan 9000 vuoden aikana viimeisen glasiaation jälkeen ei ole ollut lämpimämpää kuin nyt. Saman tutkimuksen mukaan mitään globaalia pientä jääkautta ei ole ollut: https://t.co/
@Bradfox1020Fox @CO2Coalition That's incorrect. The Roman warm period and Medieval Warm period was NOT global & was not warmer than today No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era" Neukom et
RT @Ceist8: 2/4 Contrary to @MatthewWielicki's false claim, the Medieval Warm Period was not global and was not warmer than today.…
@Latvala12357896 @kamantynen Uusin globaali lämpötilahistoriatutkimus ei lainkaan puolla sitä, että olisi ollut olemassa globaalia pientä jääkautta, keskiajan lämpökautta tai roomalaista lämpökautta: https://t.co/gWVbDb1bmx https://t.co/lGeD1cmKDX
@nyslaxx @ProfBillMcGuire The MWP was not global and was not warmer than today.
@Niemand33931238 @Daaanvdb @ernstvingerhoe1 @mislukt12345 @fmeeus1 @daanvdb The data is from 692 proxy records from 642 locations around the world, including all continental regions and major ocean basins. https://t.co/MrI5L86Gi2 https://t.co/AGhC3e6YKH
@Ljh05211999 @ProfBillMcGuire The MWP was NOT global & was not warmer than today "No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era" Neukom et al 2019 https://t.co/AGhC3e6YKH https://t.co/eRpPSIv3f
@Niemand33931238 @Daaanvdb @ernstvingerhoe1 @mislukt12345 @fmeeus1 @daanvdb Here's the link https://t.co/IyXYfDi8fI ...and the data is from 648 locations around the planet https://t.co/MrI5L86Gi2 https://t.co/zNuDsXJwQj
@DarrellBendall @hausfath @CheckerOH Those periods were not global nor were there as hot as today https://t.co/7WhPL5HrF0
@Niemand33931238 @Daaanvdb @ernstvingerhoe1 @mislukt12345 @fmeeus1 @daanvdb It’s based on proxy data from all over the globe, not models. Read this paper
@Niemand33931238 @Daaanvdb @ernstvingerhoe1 @mislukt12345 @fmeeus1 @daanvdb You could read this paper and learn why the Roman period and MWP were regional, not global
@Dostojewski61 @Daaanvdb @ernstvingerhoe1 @mislukt12345 @fmeeus1 @daanvdb That’s not global
Dennis, Er is geen enkel bewijs van globaal consistente "kleine ijstijd". Als wij spreken over de kleine ijstijd, dan spreken we over lokaal koudere periode, geen globaal fenomeen. Neukom et al. 2019 https://t.co/rACSaKzyWi Vragen altijd welkom.
RT @Ceist8: @Daaanvdb @ernstvingerhoe1 @mislukt12345 @fmeeus1 @daanvdb 3/3 The Roman warm period & Medieval warm period were NOT global &…
RT @Ceist8: @Daaanvdb @ernstvingerhoe1 @mislukt12345 @fmeeus1 @daanvdb 3/3 The Roman warm period & Medieval warm period were NOT global &…
@Daaanvdb @ernstvingerhoe1 @mislukt12345 @fmeeus1 @daanvdb 3/3 The Roman warm period & Medieval warm period were NOT global & were not warmer than today "No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common
@MauriFrancke @orastynkkynen 2/2 Näyttö siitä, että mitään globaalia pientä jääkautta tai keskiajan lämmintä kautta ei ole ollut olemassa (ja oletus niiden olemassaolosta oli päättelyvirhe, joka tehtiin hyvin rajallisten aineistojen takia) on koko ajan vah
RT @Ceist8: @chinjamesf @DawnTJ90 @GeraldKutney @MichaelEMann @DawnJT90 The Roman period & MWP were NOT global & were not warmer than today…
RT @Ceist8: @chinjamesf @DawnTJ90 @GeraldKutney @MichaelEMann @DawnJT90 The Roman period & MWP were NOT global & were not warmer than today…
RT @Ceist8: @_ClimateCraze The Roman period & MWP were NOT global & were not warmer than today "No evidence for globally coherent warm…
RT @Ceist8: @chinjamesf @DawnTJ90 @GeraldKutney @MichaelEMann @DawnJT90 The Roman period & MWP were NOT global & were not warmer than today…
RT @Ceist8: @chinjamesf @DawnTJ90 @GeraldKutney @MichaelEMann @DawnJT90 The Roman period & MWP were NOT global & were not warmer than today…
@chinjamesf @DawnTJ90 @GeraldKutney @MichaelEMann @DawnJT90 The Roman period & MWP were NOT global & were not warmer than today "No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era" Neukom et al 2019
RT @Ceist8: @_ClimateCraze The Roman period & MWP were NOT global & were not warmer than today "No evidence for globally coherent warm…
RT @Ceist8: @_ClimateCraze The Roman period & MWP were NOT global & were not warmer than today "No evidence for globally coherent warm…
RT @Ceist8: @_ClimateCraze The Roman period & MWP were NOT global & were not warmer than today "No evidence for globally coherent warm…
@_ClimateCraze The Roman period & MWP were NOT global & were not warmer than today "No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era" Neukom et al 2019 https://t.co/d776VvzAH6 https://t.co/2LCmg6B
@librari51275258 @HeikkiNuutinen @HannuJarvinenPS Viimeisen 2000 vuoden lämpimät ja kylmät kaudet, joita erittäin puutteellisten aineistojen takia aikaisemmin luultiin globaaleiksi, ovat osoittautuneet ajallisesti hajanaisiksi ja paikallisiksi, eli esim. m
RT @Ceist8: @_ClimateCraze Also, the Roman period & MWP were NOT global & were not warmer than today "No evidence for globally coherent…
@_ClimateCraze Also, the Roman period & MWP were NOT global & were not warmer than today "No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era" Neukom et al 2019 https://t.co/d776VvzAH6 https://t.co/xBr9Q
@NickLondon999 @CO2Coalition It's published in Nature🤷♂️ The MWP was not global and was not warmer than today: "No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era" -Neukom et al 2019 https://t.co/d776VvzAH