↓ Skip to main content

Perceived burdensomeness, bullying, and suicidal ideation in suicidal military personnel

Overview of attention for article published in In Session: Psychotherapy in Practice, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Perceived burdensomeness, bullying, and suicidal ideation in suicidal military personnel
Published in
In Session: Psychotherapy in Practice, July 2019
DOI 10.1002/jclp.22836
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gavin A. Crowell‐Williamson, Martina Fruhbauerova, Christopher R. DeCou, Katherine A. Comtois

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 82 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Professor 6 7%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 15 18%
Unknown 34 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 20 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 10%
Social Sciences 6 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 4%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 35 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2020.
All research outputs
#17,406,906
of 26,314,361 outputs
Outputs from In Session: Psychotherapy in Practice
#1,464
of 2,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,982
of 362,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age from In Session: Psychotherapy in Practice
#18
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,314,361 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,373 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.